US Presidential Election 2016 Discussion

Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 35, 36, 37 ... 65, 66, 67  Next
View previous topic :: View next topic
Author Message
Muslim-Bigfoot



Gender: Male
Age: 33
Location: Llanfair­pwllgwyngyll­gogery­chwyrn­drobwll­llan­tysilio­gogo­goch

  • #351
  • Posted: 07/19/2016 20:45
  • Post subject:
  • Reply with quote
alelsupreme wrote:
Along with all the shit Trump's said, it's almost certain that he'll follow the GOP line on pretty much all major issues. The GOP platform for this year has had such charming policies as allowing for conversion therapy.


This is somehow a very hard thing to understand for so many people.
_________________
"I feel like for the last two years there’s been sort of a sonic evolution happening and I’ve been experimenting more and more."
Back to top
  • Visit poster's website
  • View user's profile
  • Send private message
cestuneblague
Edgy to the Choir



Location: MA/FL

  • #352
  • Posted: 07/20/2016 01:33
  • Post subject:
  • Reply with quote
Yeah besides that glorified Oppo-research folder that was Charicature's post (some of it true, most of it negative speculation, especially in the case of Benghazi), I can understand why this election can be particularly disheartening to a lot of people. Yes, Clinton has her share of corruption (though so do about 99 percent of politicians, if not more), she certainly does have her own mountain of molehill that needs some answers. I can more than understand why people don't really trust her and the Clinton's own vast sense of political paranoia whether tenenously understanble or grossly exaggerated is often their downfall. And hopefully what comes out of the email scandal and the Benghazi witch-hunt actually works to make all politicans more accountanble and the goverment more transparent in it's actions and that it's not just used as political blackmail specifically for a Clinton takedown. I'd also like a pony.


... however what was scary about that post is how dismissive of Trump's ahem "shortcomings" it really was. There's a big difference between petulant bullying and repeatedly stoking racist flames including calls for muslim ban, insinuating all mexican immigrants are rapists, that someone is disqualified to hear his case re-tweeting (at best carelessly at worst suspiciously) posts that originate from white supremacist websites, applauding violent sucker-punches of protesters while now pretending to be the "law-and-order" candidate (whatever the fuck he means there) not to mention his complete hypocripsy when attacking many officials and his own alternatively vague and incredibly misguided stances on something actually resembling substantial policy (we're going to erase the deficit by partially defaulting on our debt ???????!!!!!!!). And as Meccalecca alluded to, it's beyond rich to constantly attack one person's legal troubles and completely ignore the other's, not to mention praising his wealth as something to be proud of besides the fact that many of the projects that he claimed as a success has frequently met with lawsuits and bankraptucy. And of course no tax returns need to be shown so you know there's nothing fishy in his finances (or that he may not be as successful as he claims, which is also the closest thing he has to argument for his qualification for presidency, which in reality is non-existent). Im not even going to bother replying to that Watergate-belittling defense of Richard Nixon, who not so ironically is someone Trump is now trying to model himself after Shocked. I thought Ted Cruz had that market cornered.


It's one thing when a primary campaign seems incompetent, reactionary, blatantly feeding off bigoted fears, little interest to actual policy ideas and even less to the actual rule of law, at times violently two-faced and constantly full of narcissistic ego-flaming, all of that needs to be taken dead seriously ESPECIALLY now since this actual presidential run is the best preview possible of how an actual Trump administration Twisted Evil Twisted Evil Twisted Evil Twisted Evil Twisted Evil Twisted Evil Twisted Evil Twisted Evil Twisted Evil Twisted Evil would function.


Now you don't want to vote for Clinton, that's fine, I can more than understand that, but anybody who actually takes the notion seriously that Trump would be a good alternative candidate to ANYBODY and someone who's backwards-looking, fire-and-brimstone-without-any-real-coals campaign is worth voting for... that is what's truly frightening about this election. Trust me, actually elect Trump as well as all the consequences that come with it and then all of a sudden he's no longer just some rich-eccentric playground-bully who only makes for a good news soundbite at the end of the day. Or you know maybe he won't let anybody of his supporters down at all!, or expose his lack of legitimate governing plans and dishonesty about his proposed ideas (cough Brexit cough).




Now I have to admit watching this convention (and really this whole election since Trump became a candidate) is about as much fun as the time I got pantsed on the jungle gym in Kindergarten and then the person who did it almost got me in trouble for it.
Back to top
  • Visit poster's website
  • View user's profile
  • Send private message
RockyRaccoon
Is it solipsistic in here or is it just me?


Gender: Male
Age: 33
Location: Maryland
United States
Moderator

  • #353
  • Posted: 07/21/2016 19:09
  • Post subject:
  • Reply with quote
meccalecca wrote:

I've got my share of problems with Hillary. She's corrupted in the way most politicians are. She's got Corporate backers who too heavily influence her decision making, and she's far too willing to perpetuate the ongoing wars. But she's nowhere near as bad as Trump could be.


Yea but that doesn't mean I want to vote for her. Personally, I'm sick of people trying to guilt me into voting for the lesser of two evils (not saying you were mecca, just that I've seen people do it).
_________________
2023 Chart

Early Psychedelic Rock

Electronic Chart
Back to top
  • Visit poster's website
  • View user's profile
  • Send private message
Allabaster





  • #354
  • Posted: 07/21/2016 20:15
  • Post subject:
  • Reply with quote
RockyRaccoon wrote:
meccalecca wrote:

I've got my share of problems with Hillary. She's corrupted in the way most politicians are. She's got Corporate backers who too heavily influence her decision making, and she's far too willing to perpetuate the ongoing wars. But she's nowhere near as bad as Trump could be.


Yea but that doesn't mean I want to vote for her. Personally, I'm sick of people trying to guilt me into voting for the lesser of two evils (not saying you were mecca, just that I've seen people do it).


Perhaps it's not your conscience you should be concerned about so much as your skin. Just yesterday Trump declared his unwillingness to commit to article V of NATO. Even the mere perception that the USA might not be willing to defend European countries from a Russian invasion threatens global stability. He genuinely has no idea what he is doing.
Back to top
meccalecca
Voice of Reason


Gender: Male
Location: The Land of Enchantment
United States

  • #355
  • Posted: 07/21/2016 21:20
  • Post subject:
  • Reply with quote
RockyRaccoon wrote:

Yea but that doesn't mean I want to vote for her. Personally, I'm sick of people trying to guilt me into voting for the lesser of two evils (not saying you were mecca, just that I've seen people do it).


I'm sick of it too. I'm on the fence really. I think the part so many are missing is that the Presidential race is not the only one. If we vote for the best people in all of the other elected positions, they should be able to hold the President in check. But Trump is a doomsday candidate. As president he could appoint multiple judges to the supreme court. And while there's an approval process he'd have to go through, it's still scary. More problematic is his volatile personality which could seriously destroy foreign relations. If I believed Jill Stein had a snowball's chance in hell I might be more likely to vote for her but she's not even on all 50 ballots.

I'm afraid reality is Hillary vs Trump vs non vote. I really wish there was a none of the above option in which if a certain % of the population chose it, the process would have to restart with both major candidates removed from the race.
_________________
http://jonnyleather.com
Back to top
  • Visit poster's website
  • View user's profile
  • Send private message
  • Visit poster's website
cestuneblague
Edgy to the Choir



Location: MA/FL

  • #356
  • Posted: 07/22/2016 20:36
  • Post subject:
  • Reply with quote
I think this does speak to the problem with a two-party system and the giant money pit that is politics in that many reasonable third-party candidates don't have a shot at all because they can't compete with the billions being pumped into the campaigns of the two major parties. So all we really have is the minority party basically doing what it can to stop the major party from passing anything (which has become especially toxic these past few years), basically setting up a "complain-ocracy" where the party in power is just voted out every couple of years.


So I mean it's completely understandable not wanting to vote for a candidate who may not be exactly the person you want to be president and where you have legitimate issue with her character, policies, transgessressions etc- but if you don't want to vote for Clinton unfortunately at this stage it basically means you would be okay with contributing to the chance of Trump getting elected- the same with 2000 and those who we're upset with the Gore nomination. That's not to say a vote for a third-party candidate is a vote for Trump or that somehow one supports Trump if they vote for say Stein, but at this point it still is basically a two candidate race and anything that takes support away from stopping Trump I have to admit is incredibly scary, even if it's more than understanble to not want to vote for somebody you don't really want to be your president either. I think it does make a compelling argument that we really need more than two voices, two options every time when we actually vote to elect candidates and that's essential to holding the two major parties accountable.
Back to top
  • Visit poster's website
  • View user's profile
  • Send private message
Allabaster





  • #357
  • Posted: 08/02/2016 18:29
  • Post subject:
  • Reply with quote
CryingGameDahlin wrote:
. I think it does make a compelling argument that we really need more than two voices, two options every time when we actually vote to elect candidates and that's essential to holding the two major parties accountable.


There were many voices in the primaries. All but two of them lost. A presidential system with many viable candidates in the general election leaves a government more vulnerable to dangerous minority factions. This can even be a risk in the primaries, as the Republicans just found out.
Back to top
Allabaster





  • #358
  • Posted: 08/04/2016 14:31
  • Post subject:
  • Reply with quote
The waves of history are high. It is spectacular theater, if you can suppress your fear.
Back to top
craola
crayon master



Location: pdx
United States

  • #359
  • Posted: 08/07/2016 07:31
  • Post subject:
  • Reply with quote
meccalecca wrote:
I really wish there was a none of the above option in which if a certain % of the population chose it, the process would have to restart with both major candidates removed from the race.

that is brilliant. not gonna happen. too much money on the line. but it's brilliant.
_________________
follow me on the bandcamp.
Back to top
  • Visit poster's website
  • View user's profile
  • Send private message
Allabaster





  • #360
  • Posted: 08/07/2016 11:57
  • Post subject:
  • Reply with quote
To me it sounds like a mechanism to help cynical white people further gum up the wheels of a system which barely limps along as it is due to the stubborn idealistic fantasies of wingnuts who aren't even going to be affected by most of the policies that they self-righteously protest.
Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   This topic is locked: you cannot edit posts or make replies.
All times are GMT
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 35, 36, 37 ... 65, 66, 67  Next
Page 36 of 67


 

Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Similar Topics
Topic Author Forum
U.S. Presidential Election 2020 Discu... baystateoftheart Politics & Religion
U.S. Presidential Candidate Capitus11 Politics & Religion
Presidential Debates RFNAPLES Politics & Religion
[ Poll ] The BEA U.S. Republican Presidential ... fellow Politics & Religion
[ Poll ] 2012 Election jbarajas Politics & Religion

 
Back to Top