| View previous topic :: View next topic |
|
|
| Poll: Should BEA auto-lock (and archive) old threads? |
|
|
|
|
| Yes |
|
59% |
[13] |
| No |
|
22% |
[5] |
| Don't care |
|
18% |
[4] |
|
|
|
|
|
| Total Votes : 22 |
|
| Author |
Message |
|
RFNAPLES
Level 8
Joined: 18 Feb 2009
Posts: 9,802
Age: 64
Gender: Male
Location: Durham, NC, USA
My Charts
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
Eggman/Walrus/Taxman
Extra-Terrestrial Originating from Earth
Joined: 12 Oct 2011
Posts: 5,419
Age: 13
Gender: Male
Location: Somewhere you've never been
My Charts
|
| #72 | Posted: 03/29/2012 13:48 | Post subject: |
 |
| RFNAPLES wrote: | OK little guy, believe what you want.  |
 Haha, good try.
It's not just me, if you noticed.
Hey, so let's say it together:
OK BEA members except for the Nape guy, believe what you want. 
_________________
(space blank until I find suitable controversial quote)
 |
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Romanelli
Bone Swah
Joined: 24 Dec 2010
Posts: 2,136
Gender: Male
Location: Denver
Moderator
My Charts
|
| #73 | Posted: 03/29/2012 15:46 | Post subject: |
|
| RFNAPLES wrote: | | Obviously, I voted no because the site is already easy to use since topics are in chronological order by last reply. Archiving will only censor "irrelevant" information and stop easy commenting on same. Archiving will force redundant topics. There are currently only 12 people with a problem with the status quo. That's less than 1% of our approximately 12800 members (.09%). |
Remember that scene in One Flew Over The Cuckoos Nest where McMurphy got a group vote on whether or not to watch the World Series? He got the majority vote from those who were sitting in the group and paying attention, but Nurse Rachet denied the vote because the people in the back who were drooling and paying no attention (and who were incapable of voting) didn't raise their hands for the Series. But because they were part of the group, their votes (or non-votes) counted.
I remember that scene.
By the logic you hinted at above, a site wide vote would defeat this (if put up for an actual counting vote), based on the fact that most people who are members of the site either don't care, don't read the boards, or haven't even been on the site for an extended period of time.
We could use the same logic to determine if, say, someones chart should be erased every 15 days, making that person start over twice a month. We could easily get a vote supporting that of about 12,788 to 12. Right?
Nobody wants that. |
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
RFNAPLES
Level 8
Joined: 18 Feb 2009
Posts: 9,802
Age: 64
Gender: Male
Location: Durham, NC, USA
My Charts
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Romanelli
Bone Swah
Joined: 24 Dec 2010
Posts: 2,136
Gender: Male
Location: Denver
Moderator
My Charts
|
| #75 | Posted: 03/29/2012 20:02 | Post subject: |
|
| RFNAPLES wrote: | | Well it has been suggested that certain charts will be ignored/deleted/uncounted if not current. While many users may not frequent the site on a regular basis, many are often hidden or guests. Is it fair to steal something from somebody just because they were unaware you were doing it and failed to protest? |
What if we do this?
At the upcoming US Presidential election, let's say that every American over the age of 18 who does not vote for the Republican candidate shall be considered as a no vote for the Republican, and thus a yes vote for Obama.
Four more years, right? |
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
RFNAPLES
Level 8
Joined: 18 Feb 2009
Posts: 9,802
Age: 64
Gender: Male
Location: Durham, NC, USA
My Charts
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Romanelli
Bone Swah
Joined: 24 Dec 2010
Posts: 2,136
Gender: Male
Location: Denver
Moderator
My Charts
|
| #77 | Posted: 03/29/2012 21:12 | Post subject: |
|
| RFNAPLES wrote: | | Only Democrats forget to vote or vote multiple times. And since IDs aren't required they hire the unemployed and illegal aliens to vote. Unions force members to contribute to the party too in exchange for a release from the onerous ObamaCare and other graft. |
That was SO not anywhere near the point you just completely deflected away from. And you know it. Although I'd love to see where you dug up those "facts".
Please try again. All of the people who did not vote PERIOD are considered as a no for the Republican, thus a yes for Obama.
Is that fair? |
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
itsit
Joined: 16 Apr 2011
Posts: 3,519
Age: 16
Gender: Male
My Charts
|
| #78 | Posted: 03/29/2012 21:55 | Post subject: |
|
Huh, so archiving threads equals this now, does it?
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
RFNAPLES
Level 8
Joined: 18 Feb 2009
Posts: 9,802
Age: 64
Gender: Male
Location: Durham, NC, USA
My Charts
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Romanelli
Bone Swah
Joined: 24 Dec 2010
Posts: 2,136
Gender: Male
Location: Denver
Moderator
My Charts
|
| #80 | Posted: 03/30/2012 01:31 | Post subject: |
|
| RFNAPLES wrote: | | No, that happens when the vocal plurality rules and don't consider the silent majority. It is wrong. |
So, you'd be for taking all the non-voters and considering them votes for Obama in November?
I'll assume by your silence that it's a yes. Because that's how I want the silent vote to be counted. I want it my way! |
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
Shop at your favourite store
