| View previous topic :: View next topic |
|
|
| Poll: The Beatles or the Rolling Stones? |
|
|
|
|
| The Beatles |
|
85% |
[41] |
| The Rolling Stones |
|
14% |
[7] |
|
|
|
|
|
| Total Votes : 48 |
|
| Author |
Message |
|
GARY
Joined: 25 Dec 2010
Posts: 9,695
My Charts
|
| #11 | Posted: 08/02/2011 19:20 | Post subject: |
 |
| Captain_Dude wrote: | | GARY wrote: | | But I also would only place about 4 bands on the Stones level for second place. |
Yep. The Beatles just are on a tier all by themselves. But, that second tier contains about four bands for me, also. The Who, Led Zeppelin, Rolling Stones, and Black Sabbath are all on my second tier of what I consider to be second-place-greatness. Those bands epitomize rock. |
You named the 4 bands that I was thinking about Captain
Between those bands I have 19 of their albums on my chart 
truthfully, I could make it 50 and feel quite justified in so doing 
.
_________________
.
I owe $100,000 and wasted 4 years of my life.
And all I got was this silly hat
. |
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
itsit
Joined: 16 Apr 2011
Posts: 3,519
Age: 16
Gender: Male
My Charts
|
| #12 | Posted: 08/02/2011 19:29 | Post subject: |
|
| The Beatles. the Stones have always been more of a hit and miss band for me, while The Beatles are my favourite. |
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Cryptozoologist
Joined: 15 Mar 2010
Posts: 254
Age: 20
Location: New York
My Charts
|
| #13 | Posted: 08/02/2011 21:07 | Post subject: |
|
| The Stones just bore me. They kept trying to catch up to the Beatles, who were the real innovators. |
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
itsit
Joined: 16 Apr 2011
Posts: 3,519
Age: 16
Gender: Male
My Charts
|
| #14 | Posted: 08/02/2011 21:26 | Post subject: |
|
| Also The Beatles ended at the right time, they didn't lapse into medicority like the Stones. |
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
btener11
Expert Treasure Hunter
Joined: 17 May 2011
Posts: 343
Age: 29
Gender: Male
Location: San Francisco
My Charts
|
| #15 | Posted: 08/02/2011 21:27 | Post subject: |
|
| itsit wrote: | | Also The Beatles ended at the right time, they didn't lapse into medicority like the Stones. |
Amen to that!
_________________
My voodoo master, my machine, baby, will not stand in line |
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
Juan Schwartz
Joined: 21 Jun 2010
Posts: 357
Age: 19
Gender: Male
My Charts
|
| #16 | Posted: 08/02/2011 21:43 | Post subject: |
|
 who voted for the stones? come out come out!
 |
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
mooseboy101
Joined: 06 Nov 2010
Posts: 1,697
Gender: Male
Location: Geneva
My Charts
|
| #17 | Posted: 08/02/2011 22:59 | Post subject: |
|
| Juan Schwartz wrote: | who voted for the stones? come out come out!
|
What? I think there better.
oh god, GARY, why do you have that gun in your hand?
_________________
sig |
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
GARY
Joined: 25 Dec 2010
Posts: 9,695
My Charts
|
| #18 | Posted: 08/03/2011 02:28 | Post subject: |
|
| mooseboy101 wrote: | | Juan Schwartz wrote: | who voted for the stones? come out come out!
|
What? I think there better.
oh god, GARY, why do you have that gun in your hand? |
That's my love gun
It doesn't shoot bullets.
It skeets 
.
_________________
.
I owe $100,000 and wasted 4 years of my life.
And all I got was this silly hat
. |
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
daveybaker
Joined: 21 Mar 2011
Posts: 133
Location: UK
My Charts
|
| #19 | Posted: 08/03/2011 15:48 | Post subject: |
|
| Beatles by a mile |
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
hairymarx1
Joined: 21 Jul 2010
Posts: 573
Gender: Male
Location: London
My Charts
|
| #20 | Posted: 08/03/2011 18:21 | Post subject: |
|
| Captain_Dude wrote: | | GARY wrote: | | But I also would only place about 4 bands on the Stones level for second place. |
Yep. The Beatles just are on a tier all by themselves. |
Why? |
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
Shop at your favourite store
