| View previous topic :: View next topic |
|
|
| Poll: The Beatles or the Rolling Stones? |
|
|
|
|
| The Beatles |
|
85% |
[41] |
| The Rolling Stones |
|
14% |
[7] |
|
|
|
|
|
| Total Votes : 48 |
|
| Author |
Message |
|
an_outlaw
A little bit wonderful
Joined: 19 Oct 2009
Posts: 3,878
Age: 23
Location: Somewhere Else
My Charts
|
| #21 | Posted: 08/03/2011 18:44 | Post subject: |
 |
| hairymarx1 wrote: | | Captain_Dude wrote: | | GARY wrote: | | But I also would only place about 4 bands on the Stones level for second place. |
Yep. The Beatles just are on a tier all by themselves. |
Why? |
Dangerous question there. Best we didn't ask those questions and let it be. 
_________________
And when this stuff gets in, you cannot get it out. |
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
mooseboy101
Joined: 06 Nov 2010
Posts: 1,697
Gender: Male
Location: Geneva
My Charts
|
| #22 | Posted: 08/03/2011 20:22 | Post subject: |
|
| an_outlaw wrote: | | hairymarx1 wrote: | | Captain_Dude wrote: | | GARY wrote: | | But I also would only place about 4 bands on the Stones level for second place. |
Yep. The Beatles just are on a tier all by themselves. |
Why? |
Dangerous question there. Best we didn't ask those questions and let it be. |
 I get it, a pun.
_________________
sig |
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
RFNAPLES
Level 8
Joined: 18 Feb 2009
Posts: 9,802
Age: 64
Gender: Male
Location: Durham, NC, USA
My Charts
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Cryptozoologist
Joined: 15 Mar 2010
Posts: 254
Age: 20
Location: New York
My Charts
|
| #24 | Posted: 08/04/2011 16:29 | Post subject: |
|
| hairymarx1 wrote: | | Captain_Dude wrote: | | GARY wrote: | | But I also would only place about 4 bands on the Stones level for second place. |
Yep. The Beatles just are on a tier all by themselves. |
Why? |
Oh, Jesus Christ, not you again. |
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
AwesomeDavid107
Joined: 30 Jan 2012
Posts: 8
My Charts
|
| #25 | Posted: 03/24/2012 02:25 | Post subject: |
|
| I will admit The Beatles are better, but to me personally I'll give it to The Stones. |
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
TrekkiELO
Joined: 02 May 2011
Posts: 175
Age: 40
Gender: Male
Location: SoCal
My Charts
|
| #26 | Posted: 03/30/2012 05:35 | Post subject: |
|
| The Beatles |
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Facetious
Joined: 12 Oct 2011
Posts: 5,563
Age: 13
Gender: Male
Location: Somewhere you've never been
My Charts
|
| #27 | Posted: 03/30/2012 13:33 | Post subject: |
|
The Beatles.
Because Sgt. Pepper is better than Satanic Majesties
Because they made the White Album, but the Stones didn't make anything that good
And while we're at it, Revolver also beats every Stones album
And while we're at it, Tomorrow Never Knows beats every Stones song
Though not by a mile
Only slightly
But still
The Beatles do beat the Stones.
_________________
 |
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Error Finn
Joined: 04 Aug 2009
Posts: 392
Age: 43
Gender: Male
Location: Finland
My Charts
|
| #28 | Posted: 03/30/2012 19:47 | Post subject: |
|
If The Beatles had continued career in a band, they would have done at some point in a weak album ... At the latest troubled 1980s.
_________________
» Woodstock is fuckin’ nothing if you’ve been at the Midnight Sun Film Festival » – D.A. Pennebaker |
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
BlueNote
Joined: 12 Sep 2011
Posts: 301
My Charts
|
| #29 | Posted: 03/31/2012 03:14 | Post subject: |
|
| The Stones. |
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
junodog4
Future Grumpy Old Man
Joined: 05 Jan 2012
Posts: 2,083
Gender: Male
Location: Calgary
My Charts
|
| #30 | Posted: 03/31/2012 03:37 | Post subject: |
|
I'll admit the Stones have become bloated since Tattoo You (and really, since Some Girls). However, I still really respect their work, and they find their way into my CD player often.
That said, it's the Beatles. C'mon...
Voted Beatles.
Put the Stones up against Dylan or Pink Floyd... |
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
Shop at your favourite store
