Best Ever Albums

Re: [CLOSED] BYT - GROUP F|FIGHT 3: 1968 DEFEATS 2001 (21-13)

Mr. Shankly — Tue, 16 Oct 2012 00:55:31 GMT

Author: Mr. Shankly

Posted: 10/16/2012 04:55

Jhereko wrote:

:?

then why would you bring it up again 10 hours after it had clearly finished :?:

I was unaware of the timeline. I will admit that I didn't read every single post, so I didn't realize the issue had been resolved. I don't think I was the only one either. But you're right. It's my fault this whole controversy erupted. 🙄

Re: [CLOSED] BYT - GROUP F|FIGHT 3: 1968 DEFEATS 2001 (21-13)

Anonymous — Mon, 15 Oct 2012 10:11:14 GMT

Author: Anonymous

Posted: 10/15/2012 14:11

cartoken wrote:

can't believe the best team of the tournament so far lost this match ! :cry:

🤣

Re: [CLOSED] BYT - GROUP F|FIGHT 3: 1968 DEFEATS 2001 (21-13)

cartoken — Mon, 15 Oct 2012 09:53:44 GMT

Author: cartoken

Posted: 10/15/2012 13:53

can't believe the best team of the tournament so far lost this match ! 😢

Re: [CLOSED] BYT - GROUP F|FIGHT 3: 1968 DEFEATS 2001 (21-13)

Anonymous — Mon, 15 Oct 2012 08:57:20 GMT

Author: Anonymous

Posted: 10/15/2012 12:57

1
9
6
8

W
I
N
S
!

Re: [CLOSED] BYT - GROUP F|FIGHT 3: 1968 DEFEATS 2001 (21-13)

Anonymous — Mon, 15 Oct 2012 04:21:29 GMT

Author: Anonymous

Posted: 10/15/2012 08:21

NOW: THE 1968 LIVE SHOW!

THE ZOMBIES!

Link

THE VELVET UNDERGROUND!

Link

SIMON & GARFUNKEL!

Link

THE ROLLING STONES!

Link

ARETHA FRANKLIN!

Link

THE BEATLES!

Link

Re: [CLOSED] BYT - GROUP F|FIGHT 3: 1968 DEFEATS 2001 (21-13)

Anonymous — Mon, 15 Oct 2012 03:54:07 GMT

Author: Anonymous

Posted: 10/15/2012 07:54

Mr. Shankly wrote:

Also, I thought we were trying to avoid the drama we had before. Starting up this controversy is only going to be counterproductive. [-X

😕

then why would you bring it up again 10 hours after it had clearly finished ❓

Re: [CLOSED] BYT - GROUP F|FIGHT 3: 1968 DEFEATS 2001 (21-13)

Mr. Shankly — Mon, 15 Oct 2012 01:26:00 GMT

Author: Mr. Shankly

Posted: 10/15/2012 05:26

cartoken wrote:

don't agree at all (even if he voted against 2001). if he wants to vote each time for the older year, it's his choice (a stupid one) but that's democracy.

�'� Well said. Totally agree with Cartoken and also what Nezzle and Bates and others have said. If you start taking away votes or de-legitimatizing votes, this tournament loses all of its integrity. As far as controlling the reason people vote, it's just not possible. As Cartoken points out above, that's democracy. It's the best system, but it's still an imperfect one.

Also, I thought we were trying to avoid the drama we had before. Starting up this controversy is only going to be counterproductive. 🫵

Re: [CLOSED] BYT - GROUP F|FIGHT 3: 1968 DEFEATS 2001 (21-13)

Anonymous — Sun, 14 Oct 2012 14:54:26 GMT

Author: Anonymous

Posted: 10/14/2012 18:54

RFNAPLES wrote:

No I don't question every mods ability to moderate

Right 🙄

Re: [CLOSED] BYT - GROUP F|FIGHT 3: 1968 DEFEATS 2001 (21-13)

RFNAPLES — Sun, 14 Oct 2012 14:50:40 GMT

Author: RFNAPLES

Posted: 10/14/2012 18:50

Jhereko wrote:

You question every mods ability to moderate 🤣

No I don't question every mods ability to moderate but I do question yours.

Re: [CLOSED] BYT - GROUP F|FIGHT 3: 1968 DEFEATS 2001 (21-13)

Anonymous — Sun, 14 Oct 2012 14:48:47 GMT

Author: Anonymous

Posted: 10/14/2012 18:48

So anyways, 68 OR 01? I VOTE 68 IN THIS MATCH

Re: [CLOSED] BYT - GROUP F|FIGHT 3: 1968 DEFEATS 2001 (21-13)

Anonymous — Sun, 14 Oct 2012 14:47:19 GMT

Author: Anonymous

Posted: 10/14/2012 18:47

Saoirse wrote:

Yeah let's put this nonsense behind us and focus on the match

Still think it could be close, but the 68 team is just really strong this time. Still need to listen to some of the 2001 team though

Yeah, I think 1968 is just too strong overall.

If you haven't already, you should definitely listen to The Cold Vein. A landmark album in underground hip-hop, and a hip-hop album often cited by those who don't listen to a lot of hip-hop as one they like.

Re: [CLOSED] BYT - GROUP F|FIGHT 3: 1968 DEFEATS 2001 (21-13)

Anonymous — Sun, 14 Oct 2012 14:46:37 GMT

Author: Anonymous

Posted: 10/14/2012 18:46

RFNAPLES wrote:

I'll gladly accept your apologies. It is statements and comments like these that you make that force me to question your ability to moderate.

You question every mods ability to moderate 🤣

It's responses like the one you just gave that make me question your ability to comprehend what you've read. Thankyou for reposting exactly what I had just stated 2 posts before.

Re: [CLOSED] BYT - GROUP F|FIGHT 3: 1968 DEFEATS 2001 (21-13)

RFNAPLES — Sun, 14 Oct 2012 14:46:12 GMT

Author: RFNAPLES

Posted: 10/14/2012 18:46

thejoj96 wrote:

What's your problem with moderators?

They are not needed. Some are also unqualified to act as same.

Re: [CLOSED] BYT - GROUP F|FIGHT 3: 1968 DEFEATS 2001 (21-13)

Anonymous — Sun, 14 Oct 2012 14:43:30 GMT

Author: Anonymous

Posted: 10/14/2012 18:43

Yeah let's put this nonsense behind us and focus on the match

Still think it could be close, but the 68 team is just really strong this time. Still need to listen to some of the 2001 team though

Re: [CLOSED] BYT - GROUP F|FIGHT 3: 1968 DEFEATS 2001 (21-13)

Anonymous — Sun, 14 Oct 2012 14:40:21 GMT

Author: Anonymous

Posted: 10/14/2012 18:40

RFNAPLES wrote:

I'll gladly accept your apologies. It is statements and comments like these that you make that force me to question your ability to moderate.

He has apologised. Leave it out.

Re: [CLOSED] BYT - GROUP F|FIGHT 3: 1968 DEFEATS 2001 (21-13)

Anonymous — Sun, 14 Oct 2012 14:40:17 GMT

Author: Anonymous

Posted: 10/14/2012 18:40

RFNAPLES wrote:

I'll gladly accept your apologies. It is statements and comments like these that you make that force me to question your ability to moderate.

What's your problem with moderators?

Re: [CLOSED] BYT - GROUP F|FIGHT 3: 1968 DEFEATS 2001 (21-13)

RFNAPLES — Sun, 14 Oct 2012 14:38:43 GMT

Author: RFNAPLES

Posted: 10/14/2012 18:38

Jhereko wrote:

Plus I directly asked him recently on one of the polls what his vote was based on and the fact that he didn't respond makes me pretty certain he's ignoring the whole premise of the tournament. If he isn't then I do apologise but I very much doubt it.

Jerko, what makes you think I actually read your questions to me? Do you know about PMs? Nevertheless, here is what I told you previously.

Jhereko wrote:

NAPLES are you voting based on the teams or just the years as a whole?

RFNAPLES wrote:

Neither, I am voting for the albums/songs presented.

I'll gladly accept your apologies. It is statements and comments like these that you make that force me to question your ability to moderate.

Re: [CLOSED] BYT - GROUP F|FIGHT 3: 1968 DEFEATS 2001 (21-13)

Anonymous — Sun, 14 Oct 2012 14:38:27 GMT

Author: Anonymous

Posted: 10/14/2012 18:38

Norman Bates wrote:

This is all about Naples, and nothing about the game. Either you have a strong enough basis to have him banned from the forum once and for all, or you don't, but this is no way to get back at him.

Jumping to conclusions, I feel.

Re: [CLOSED] BYT - GROUP F|FIGHT 3: 1968 DEFEATS 2001 (21-13)

Anonymous — Sun, 14 Oct 2012 14:29:04 GMT

Author: Anonymous

Posted: 10/14/2012 18:29

Norman Bates wrote:

You have absolutely no basis on which to build your case. And even if you had, you cannot know how many silent voters vote for years instead of teams, and you will never talk about them. From what I know, you cannot even be sure what year he votes for except for what he says! This is all about Naples, and nothing about the game. Either you have a strong enough basis to have him banned from the forum once and for all, or you don't, but this is no way to get back at him.

None of that. At all. If you look back at what I wrote in the last few posts and the fact that I didn't see his response where he directly said he was voting for the albums and singles presented you can see how I drew a well founded conclusion. Still my fault for not seeing that response from him.

Re: [CLOSED] BYT - GROUP F|FIGHT 3: 1968 DEFEATS 2001 (21-13)

Norman Bates — Sun, 14 Oct 2012 14:26:52 GMT

Author: Norman Bates

Posted: 10/14/2012 18:26

Jhereko wrote:

I feel like I've written 3 or 4 times now that I'm not basing it on whether he votes for the older or newer year...