Best Ever Albums

Re: Let's Discuss Let's Rank Results

Anonymous — Sat, 4 Apr 2015 16:00:26 GMT

Author: Anonymous

Posted: 04/04/2015 20:00

I can't see this thread remaining musical discussion; I'll be locking it for now.

Re: Let's Discuss Let's Rank Results

Skinny — Sat, 4 Apr 2015 12:13:59 GMT

Author: Skinny

Posted: 04/04/2015 16:13

CubaZed wrote:

let's not make this another "Let's Tease JMan Thread."

But they're the best type of threads.

Re: Let's Discuss Let's Rank Results

nachosbob — Sat, 4 Apr 2015 03:07:24 GMT

Author: nachosbob

Posted: 04/04/2015 07:07

Re: Let's Discuss Let's Rank Results

Anonymous — Sat, 4 Apr 2015 02:47:03 GMT

Author: Anonymous

Posted: 04/04/2015 06:47

JMan, again, maybe just spend a little more time looking at your post and deciding "does this sound reasonable" before pressing submit. And maybe think for a minute if a particular, um, "discussion" topic needs a whole new thread.

And I agree let's get this off Berating Ol' JMan and into... well to be honest I don't see much reason for this thread's existience I donno Im going to go listen to Ghost Bath

Re: Let's Discuss Let's Rank Results

RockyRaccoon — Sat, 4 Apr 2015 01:07:10 GMT

Author: RockyRaccoon

Posted: 04/04/2015 05:07

JMan wrote:

To be honest, Frogger, that post was not well thought out at all. I said it was PREDICTABLE, as in it was easy to see coming. That does not mean I immediately have to be disappointed. Yes, it's true, that most cases of predictability are disappointing. But you should be able to look up a dictionary online.

http://www.thesaurus.com/browse/predictable

In other words, I could foresee it. Does that mean I'm disappointed? No. Because I always felt that in one way or another, the majority of the order of greatness usually determined by the populace seemed to match my opinion. So, there would be no need to be disappointed about anything. Now if you're done misunderstanding me, I'd like to get back on topic.

please tell me all of that post didn't just happen

Re: Let's Discuss Let's Rank Results

Mercury — Fri, 3 Apr 2015 23:18:23 GMT

Author: Mercury

Posted: 04/04/2015 03:18

CubaZed wrote:

Okay I probably didn't help this with my disclaimer post but let's not make this another "Let's Tease JMan Thread." We have a ton of those already and this could be interesting to discuss community members opinions.

A nice comment on a super cool thread...

...NOT!

HahHahahahahahahahahahahahah!!!!!!!

Re: Let's Discuss Let's Rank Results

Anonymous — Fri, 3 Apr 2015 23:13:17 GMT

Author: Anonymous

Posted: 04/04/2015 03:13

JMan wrote:

See JMan, the problem here is that you're setting yourself up as the perfect straight man. Frogger's original jab was a bit of a stretch, but when you defend yourself with two paragraphs and a link to a thesaurus (which you call a dictionary), you're just asking for trouble/hilarity.

But then I'm still not convinced that you don't already know that... 🤔

Re: Let's Discuss Let's Rank Results

Anonymous — Fri, 3 Apr 2015 22:54:45 GMT

Author: Anonymous

Posted: 04/04/2015 02:54

Okay I probably didn't help this with my disclaimer post but let's not make this another "Let's Tease JMan Thread." We have a ton of those already and this could be interesting to discuss community members opinions.

Re: Let's Discuss Let's Rank Results

Anonymous — Fri, 3 Apr 2015 22:52:19 GMT

Author: Anonymous

Posted: 04/04/2015 02:52

To be honest, Frogger, that post was not well thought out at all. I said it was PREDICTABLE, as in it was easy to see coming. That does not mean I immediately have to be disappointed. Yes, it's true, that most cases of predictability are disappointing. But you should be able to look up a dictionary online.

http://www.thesaurus.com/browse/predictable

In other words, I could foresee it. Does that mean I'm disappointed? No. Because I always felt that in one way or another, the majority of the order of greatness usually determined by the populace seemed to match my opinion. So, there would be no need to be disappointed about anything. Now if you're done misunderstanding me, I'd like to get back on topic.

Re: Let's Discuss Let's Rank Results

Anonymous — Fri, 3 Apr 2015 22:41:59 GMT

Author: Anonymous

Posted: 04/04/2015 02:41

I misread the original post as "fadgadget"

Re: Let's Discuss Let's Rank Results

MrFrogger — Fri, 3 Apr 2015 22:41:30 GMT

Author: MrFrogger

Posted: 04/04/2015 02:41

JMan wrote:

When did I say I was disappointed?

JMan wrote:

I also found it to be predictable.

Re: Let's Discuss Let's Rank Results

Anonymous — Fri, 3 Apr 2015 22:40:19 GMT

Author: Anonymous

Posted: 04/04/2015 02:40

When did I say I was disappointed? I said it was obvious, not disappointing.

Re: Let's Discuss Let's Rank Results

RockyRaccoon — Fri, 3 Apr 2015 20:43:04 GMT

Author: RockyRaccoon

Posted: 04/04/2015 00:43

MrFrogger wrote:

So you're disappointed that the results fell exactly in line with your views?

It sucks being right all the time 🙁

Re: Let's Discuss Let's Rank Results

MrFrogger — Fri, 3 Apr 2015 19:36:09 GMT

Author: MrFrogger

Posted: 04/03/2015 23:36

JMan wrote:

I also found it to be predictable. It was obvious Nevermind and In Utero would be 1 and 2.

So you're disappointed that the results fell exactly in line with your views?

Re: Let's Discuss Let's Rank Results

Anonymous — Fri, 3 Apr 2015 19:33:52 GMT

Author: Anonymous

Posted: 04/03/2015 23:33

This thread is not affiliated with the BEA Edition of Let's Rank or its sole proprietor CubaZed.

The contents of this thread does not reflect the official opinion of said Zed. Responsibility for the information and views expressed therein lies entirely with the author, JMan.

Re: Let's Discuss Let's Rank Results

nachosbob — Fri, 3 Apr 2015 19:31:45 GMT

Author: nachosbob

Posted: 04/03/2015 23:31

I'm still convinced that thigh gap sunsets is James Otto's best, unfortunately nobody on BEA seems to agree with me 🤔

Let's Discuss Let's Rank Results

Anonymous — Fri, 3 Apr 2015 19:30:04 GMT

Author: Anonymous

Posted: 04/03/2015 23:30

I was going through a couple form the past that I left before I had the chance to vote for the ones I liked the most. SO I thought we could discuss the results here, instead of bumping up old threads. If you want to see all the past "Let's Rank" threads, just click on the current one.

So here are my thoughts on Nirvana. Nirvana's order was exactly like I would've ranked my top 5, tbh. I've heard all 5 multiple times.
Nevermind: 90 (over 10 times)
In Utero: 85 (3 or 4)
MTV: 82 (2)
Bleach: 80 (2)
Incesticide: 75 (2)

I also found it to be predictable. It was obvious Nevermind and In Utero would be 1 and 2.