Best Ever Albums

Re: Radiohead....emo?

alelsupreme — Wed, 22 Jun 2011 13:51:40 GMT

Author: alelsupreme

Posted: 06/22/2011 17:51

kidamnesiac wrote:

john lennon would tell everyone that thom yorke is god. Paul is at home right now trying to sound like radiohead. 75 percent of your favorite bands will tell you that radiohead is light years ahead.

Even radiohead fans dont understand how great they are. THey are the best band ever and only 5 percent of the world likes them. That alone tells you that they are beyond comprehension. It took 2 years for radiohead fans themselves to figure out that kid a is sex. it took 6 months to figure out that in rainbows is the prettiest album ever.
Critics called ok computer the best album ever before it was even released, they didnt know exactly why or what was going on exactly but they knew it was the revolution. Jonny is a musical genious and he is only 10 percent of thom yorke. Thom is god on earth disguised as clay aikens father.

Paul's music sounds nothing like Radiohead, and Radiohead were much better when they had the guitar as the lead instrument.

Re: Radiohead....emo?

ShaneSpear — Tue, 14 Jun 2011 10:18:19 GMT

Author: ShaneSpear

Posted: 06/14/2011 14:18

Somebody give Jonny his bloomin' guitar back! 😮

Re: Radiohead....emo?

Anonymous — Tue, 14 Jun 2011 09:59:12 GMT

Author: Anonymous

Posted: 06/14/2011 13:59

I see the Bends as the last album before Radiohead stopped having fun with music and started making fucking concept albums (or concept driven albums) and that's why it's my favorite

'Kid A is a bit weird'

Re: Radiohead....emo?

Mr. Shankly — Tue, 14 Jun 2011 08:43:15 GMT

Author: Mr. Shankly

Posted: 06/14/2011 12:43

Polythene Pam wrote:

purple wrote:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UHS3ci9H_Uc

🤣 🤣 🤣 :lol:

🤣 This is hilarious! Also, OMG! I am that guy. I agree with everything he says, with the exception of his liking Pablo Honey (although it's not a horrible record).

Re: Radiohead....emo?

40footwolf — Mon, 13 Jun 2011 22:22:29 GMT

Author: 40footwolf

Posted: 06/14/2011 02:22

Link

Link

I totally see the connection!

Re: Radiohead....emo?

Anonymous — Mon, 13 Jun 2011 20:44:04 GMT

Author: Anonymous

Posted: 06/14/2011 00:44

purple wrote:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UHS3ci9H_Uc

🤣 🤣 🤣 🤣

Re: Radiohead....emo?

kidamnesiac — Mon, 13 Jun 2011 20:00:24 GMT

Author: kidamnesiac

Posted: 06/14/2011 00:00

i think that there is a twist to that story the furnace singer made a mistake and caused beck to make the song "harry partch" or i could be wrong.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tkQ5_AOLJ1A

Re: Radiohead....emo?

Anonymous — Mon, 13 Jun 2011 19:52:31 GMT

Author: Anonymous

Posted: 06/13/2011 23:52

purple wrote:

the 'great' was objective, and objective respect doesn't necessarily come with pleasure from the listener, which was the 'like' part. I realize Radiohead is a critically acclaimed band, but I don't listen to them much because I'd rather be listening to other things. You'll have to fill me in on the Fiery Furnaces connection.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UHS3ci9H_Uc

🤣
That was pretty funny
"Pablo Honey?..."
"Get out"

just google fiery furnaces Radiohead it'll be the first few things to come up. basically its just the guy from fiery furnaces slagging off Radiohead like he was a Gallagher brother and they were Blur.

Re: Radiohead....emo?

Anonymous — Mon, 13 Jun 2011 19:46:11 GMT

Author: Anonymous

Posted: 06/13/2011 23:46

the 'great' was objective, and objective respect doesn't necessarily come with pleasure from the listener, which was the 'like' part. I realize Radiohead is a critically acclaimed band, but I don't listen to them much because I'd rather be listening to other things. You'll have to fill me in on the Fiery Furnaces connection.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UHS3ci9H_Uc

Re: Radiohead....emo?

Anonymous — Mon, 13 Jun 2011 19:15:07 GMT

Author: Anonymous

Posted: 06/13/2011 23:15

okay. true enough.

purple wrote:

Just because a band's great doesn't mean everyone has to like them

A. So you think they are great

B. If the "great" in that comment is to be taken objectively then why would anyone not like them? only to try and distance themselves from the norm as possible (see:Fiery Furnaces).

C. (continuing from B) why not like something great?

Re: Radiohead....emo?

Anonymous — Mon, 13 Jun 2011 19:04:23 GMT

Author: Anonymous

Posted: 06/13/2011 23:04

most of the bands I listen to stopped making music before Radiohead blew up; I know that doesn't necessarily mean that they don't like Radiohead, but it does show that Radiohead had no influence on them, yet several of them are an influence on Radiohead. Most of the music I listen to since Radiohead blew up are in different genres trying to achieve different things and have little influence from Radiohead. I think it was a safe statement. Just because a band's great doesn't mean everyone has to like them

Re: Radiohead....emo?

Anonymous — Mon, 13 Jun 2011 18:47:20 GMT

Author: Anonymous

Posted: 06/13/2011 22:47

purple wrote:

they're talented, not gods. every now and then you need to inject some realism into the kids, ya know?

that I can agree with. I like them a lot, but yeah some people do hold them in an unequal proportion to other artists almost like they're above music itself. What I don't agree with is you saying that 75% of the bands you listen to don't give a fuck about Radiohead, that's just something you can't back up.

Re: Radiohead....emo?

Anonymous — Mon, 13 Jun 2011 18:41:02 GMT

Author: Anonymous

Posted: 06/13/2011 22:41

they're talented, not gods. every now and then you need to inject some realism into the kids, ya know?

Re: Radiohead....emo?

Anonymous — Mon, 13 Jun 2011 18:03:23 GMT

Author: Anonymous

Posted: 06/13/2011 22:03

purple wrote:

I don't give a fuck about what John Lennon would say, and I care even less about Paul's current music. 75% of the bands I listen to definitely don't give a fuck about Radiohead either because (1) they're disbanded or dead or (2) just don't give a fuck because they're making different music. Less than 5% of the world likes Radiohead because about 10% of the world is above the poverty line, and I'm absolutely positive less than 1/3 of that 10% gives a fuck about Radiohead. But you are right in that Thom looks like a retard

purple: too cool for radiohead, apparently

Re: Radiohead....emo?

Anonymous — Mon, 13 Jun 2011 16:59:51 GMT

Author: Anonymous

Posted: 06/13/2011 20:59

I don't give a fuck about what John Lennon would say, and I care even less about Paul's current music. 75% of the bands I listen to definitely don't give a fuck about Radiohead either because (1) they're disbanded or dead or (2) just don't give a fuck because they're making different music. Less than 5% of the world likes Radiohead because about 10% of the world is above the poverty line, and I'm absolutely positive less than 1/3 of that 10% gives a fuck about Radiohead. But you are right in that Thom looks like a retard

Re: Radiohead....emo?

kidamnesiac — Mon, 13 Jun 2011 16:22:01 GMT

Author: kidamnesiac

Posted: 06/13/2011 20:22

john lennon would tell everyone that thom yorke is god. Paul is at home right now trying to sound like radiohead. 75 percent of your favorite bands will tell you that radiohead is light years ahead.

Even radiohead fans dont understand how great they are. THey are the best band ever and only 5 percent of the world likes them. That alone tells you that they are beyond comprehension. It took 2 years for radiohead fans themselves to figure out that kid a is sex. it took 6 months to figure out that in rainbows is the prettiest album ever.
Critics called ok computer the best album ever before it was even released, they didnt know exactly why or what was going on exactly but they knew it was the revolution. Jonny is a musical genious and he is only 10 percent of thom yorke. Thom is god on earth disguised as clay aikens father.

Re: Radiohead....emo?

Bork — Wed, 23 Jun 2010 08:22:50 GMT

Author: Bork

Posted: 06/23/2010 12:22

Oh come on, you're bein' unfair here. KISS is lightweight pop-metal for sure (possibly bar the first two albums or so), but they were the masters of memorable hard rock hooks, they had an intense drummer, one of the most talented guitarists out there, and a sound that delivered more punch than anything at the time. It's impossible to dislike Detroit Rock City, I Love It Loud, and Rock and Roll All Nite. After Creatures of the Night they should have retired of course, but from 1974 to 1982 they were damn good. Any comparison with the fake mockery of whatever worked last year that is Nickelback is just plain mean.

Re: Radiohead....emo?

thomas697 — Mon, 21 Jun 2010 20:50:52 GMT

Author: thomas697

Posted: 06/22/2010 00:50

I used to like Kiss when I was younger .. but I think they're pretty shit now, I put then in the same category as Iron Butterfly, Jefferson Starship and Nickelback! Kiss is probably the better of the four, but still they aren't very good!

Re: Radiohead....emo?

audiooasis2012 — Mon, 21 Jun 2010 15:31:21 GMT

Author: audiooasis2012

Posted: 06/21/2010 19:31

i CANT STAND KISS! they stand for everything i hate about the music industry gene simmons will do anything for a dollar which includes releasing shitty material. i do think a KISS live show would b kinda cool tho especially considering their pyrotechnics

Re: Radiohead....emo?

Ironic Karma — Mon, 21 Jun 2010 15:10:23 GMT

Author: Ironic Karma

Posted: 06/21/2010 19:10

purple wrote:

you're music taste is shitty if you think KISS is shitty. obviously you haven't heard the gospel of Animalize

Actually I have heard Animalize, when I went on a road trip with my friend and his dad played all the Kiss's discography and I forgot to bring my iPod so I was stuck listening to that garbage. When he got to that album, it was the same thing as the rest of the albums. Simple guitar riffs, mediocre drumming and shallow lyrics.