Best Ever Albums

Re: About Pet Sounds title and artwork

Anonymous — Sat, 4 Aug 2018 07:07:45 GMT

Author: Anonymous

Posted: 08/04/2018 11:07

sethmadsen wrote:

I seriously thought it was due to the dogs barking at the end... pretty lame interpretation.

I thought exactly that (and wasn't convinced too). Although i must say these barkings (and train) at the end are perfect !

Re: About Pet Sounds title and artwork

Anonymous — Sat, 4 Aug 2018 06:58:58 GMT

Author: Anonymous

Posted: 08/04/2018 10:58

HazeyTwilight wrote:

brian also wanted to bring a horse into the studio

"my horse would be so bitchin' in here"

😄 yes ! i'm just reading a Rolling Stone article on this:
“Hey Chuck, is it possible we could bring a horse in here if we don’t screw anything up?” he can be heard asking engineer Chuck Britz. “I beg your pardon?” comes the stunned reply. But Wilson won’t be deterred. “Honest to God, now, the horse is tame and everything!” For whatever reason, he ultimately decided to stick with the canines. (J Runtagh, Rolling Stone magazine)

Re: About Pet Sounds title and artwork

HazeyTwilight — Sat, 4 Aug 2018 06:45:44 GMT

Author: HazeyTwilight

Posted: 08/04/2018 10:45

brian also wanted to bring a horse into the studio

"my horse would be so bitchin' in here"

Re: About Pet Sounds title and artwork

albummaster — Sat, 4 Aug 2018 06:25:26 GMT

Author: albummaster

Posted: 08/04/2018 10:25

rkm wrote:

I have an Australian version like this one, where they changed the album name and the cover artwork. Perhaps whoever was in charge of marketing in Australia didn’t like the pet sounds concept at all?

https://www.discogs.com/The-Beach-Boys-The-Fabulous-Beach-Boys/release/12163718

didn't know about that... interesting 🤔

Re: About Pet Sounds title and artwork

RoundTheBend — Fri, 3 Aug 2018 21:24:46 GMT

Author: RoundTheBend

Posted: 08/04/2018 01:24

Cool discovery.

I seriously thought it was due to the dogs barking at the end... pretty lame interpretation. "Nobody wants to hear animals on record." That's what I remember from some dramatization... but I was like 12 when I watched that.

Anyway, I like your find.

Re: About Pet Sounds title and artwork

Anonymous — Fri, 3 Aug 2018 15:42:09 GMT

Author: Anonymous

Posted: 08/03/2018 19:42

HazeyTwilight wrote:

with the eclectic mix of instruments that are on display on the album, you could say that Brian Wilson had a few *pet sounds* he wanted for the album

yes, as I said that's indeed Brian's interpretation of the title. But then there is this artwork that confuses everything....

HazeyTwilight wrote:

also doggos bork at the end could have something to do with it idk

Yes, but that's very few pet sounds : ) (not really justifying a title imo)

Re: About Pet Sounds title and artwork

Anonymous — Fri, 3 Aug 2018 15:37:01 GMT

Author: Anonymous

Posted: 08/03/2018 19:37

rkm wrote:

This makes me love the actual cover !

Re: About Pet Sounds title and artwork

HazeyTwilight — Fri, 3 Aug 2018 06:51:39 GMT

Author: HazeyTwilight

Posted: 08/03/2018 10:51

with the eclectic mix of instruments that are on display on the album, you could say that Brian Wilson had a few *pet sounds* he wanted for the album

also doggos bork at the end could have something to do with it idk

Re: About Pet Sounds title and artwork

rkm — Fri, 3 Aug 2018 05:30:00 GMT

Author: rkm

Posted: 08/03/2018 09:30

I have an Australian version like this one, where they changed the album name and the cover artwork. Perhaps whoever was in charge of marketing in Australia didn’t like the pet sounds concept at all?

https://www.discogs.com/The-Beach-Boys-The-Fabulous-Beach-Boys/release/12163718

About Pet Sounds title and artwork

Anonymous — Thu, 2 Aug 2018 14:20:12 GMT

Author: Anonymous

Posted: 08/02/2018 18:20

Just a few random summer thoughts, and questions…

So I’ve just realized (because of my English..) that “pet sounds” can also mean “favorite sounds”. In that sense (without any animal allusion, let’s ignore the cover for a while) it’s actually a beautiful title I think, very poetic, going very well with the delicate content of the album. No surprise it was Brian Wilson’s interpretation (as I’ve just learned too).

Mike Love interpretation is more animal-oriented, but with a double-meaning (if I understand well):
"We were standing in the hallway in one of the recording studios, either Western or Columbia, and we didn't have a title. ... We had taken pictures at the zoo and ... there were animal sounds on the record, and we were thinking, well, it's our favorite music of that time, so I said, 'Why don't we call it Pet Sounds?'”

As for me, because of that cover, I’ve always, until now, related the title solely to animal’s sounds, as a fun title, so that when I thought or listened to the record, somehow I overlooked the title and artwork, thinking it was another piece of laid-back Beach Boys humor..
Is that your case too, or have you always interpreted the title also as “favorite sounds” (with more or less double-meaning, in regard of that cover)?
I’m curious to know if I’m just misinterpreting English..

Also, would you imagine a different cover artwork, perhaps suiting the title better?
Or are you happy with the title and cover as they are, because you’re used to it, or because it’s nice that they don’t take themselves seriously. But if so, don’t you think that there is too much contrast between, as a journalist put it, “songs of high romanticism, [and] an album cover of stark banality“?

Edit : the dog on the picture is Louie, one of the two dogs barking at the end of the album with the passing train, all with a beautiful visual and melancholic effect.