Best Ever Albums

Re: ZOMG!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Anonymous — Thu, 17 Feb 2011 13:31:55 GMT

Author: Anonymous

Posted: 02/17/2011 18:31

teodor_matz wrote:

My friend (who is a big Radiohead fan) and I fighted all last year which album would be best, this one or Kanyes My Beautiful Dark Twisted Fantasy, so i really hope this suck so he shut up, good thing it probably will, Radiohead doing krautrock noise in the studio for one hour doesn't sound to fun...

no need to compare or condemn things before you've experienced them Teodor

Re: ZOMG!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

teodor_matz — Thu, 17 Feb 2011 11:51:13 GMT

Author: teodor_matz

Posted: 02/17/2011 16:51

My friend (who is a big Radiohead fan) and I fighted all last year which album would be best, this one or Kanyes My Beautiful Dark Twisted Fantasy, so i really hope this suck so he shut up, good thing it probably will, Radiohead doing krautrock noise in the studio for one hour doesn't sound to fun...

Re: ZOMG!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

HyperBully — Mon, 14 Feb 2011 21:07:59 GMT

Author: HyperBully

Posted: 02/15/2011 02:07

Applerill wrote:

Okay, now that I've read all the specs on this, I'll speak my mind: With this kind of gauging, this better be just as good as OK Computer. OR ELSE. JK

But really, Itunes charges $9 for an AAC file that's a much higher quality, includes digital liner notes, and can be easily accessed through your Itunes account. Amazon MP3 sells new albums like this for $8 at most.

Why is Thom doing all this highway robbery?

Oh well. I'll still buy it anyway and (probably) really enjoy it. I'm just sorta annoyed.

You have no reason to be annoyed. 256 kpbs AAC is NOT better than a 320 kpbs MP3. It's plain ignorant to assume that just because something is a supposedly better format (iTunes AAC), it is better than a higher bitrate in another, also lossy format. The bitrate is the most important thing with lossy files, not the format. iTunes store files are only 256 kpbs AAC, while these files are 320 kpbs MP3. In addition, an uncompressed WAV download is offered for five dollars more. That price increase for true lossless quality is the only ripoff. I'm just glad they're offering it at all, unlike with In Rainbows. Also, how do you know they won't include digital liner notes? I wouldn't be at all surprised if they did. I expect nothing but the highest quality from Radiohead. I can't say the same thing for iTunes.

Re: ZOMG!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Mr. Shankly — Mon, 14 Feb 2011 20:02:54 GMT

Author: Mr. Shankly

Posted: 02/15/2011 01:02

bcaie16 wrote:

Holy *********************************. Can't wait. They sure do like the surprises

I thought they wanted no alarms and no surprises. 🤣

Re: ZOMG!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

bcaie16 — Mon, 14 Feb 2011 18:47:51 GMT

Author: bcaie16

Posted: 02/14/2011 23:47

Holy *********************************. Can't wait. They sure do like the surprises

Re: ZOMG!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Applerill — Mon, 14 Feb 2011 08:25:20 GMT

Author: Applerill

Posted: 02/14/2011 13:25

Okay, now that I've read all the specs on this, I'll speak my mind: With this kind of gauging, this better be just as good as OK Computer. OR ELSE. JK

But really, Itunes charges $9 for an AAC file that's a much higher quality, includes digital liner notes, and can be easily accessed through your Itunes account. Amazon MP3 sells new albums like this for $8 at most.

Why is Thom doing all this highway robbery?

Oh well. I'll still buy it anyway and (probably) really enjoy it. I'm just sorta annoyed.

Re: ZOMG!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Anonymous — Mon, 14 Feb 2011 08:12:23 GMT

Author: Anonymous

Posted: 02/14/2011 13:12

no problem yours is a little clearer as to its subject matter 😁

Re: ZOMG!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Anonymous — Mon, 14 Feb 2011 08:09:11 GMT

Author: Anonymous

Posted: 02/14/2011 13:09

Sorry I missed your thread, I can't wait for this, so excited!!!

Re: ZOMG!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Applerill — Mon, 14 Feb 2011 08:04:31 GMT

Author: Applerill

Posted: 02/14/2011 13:04

This will be my first 2011 album, so I'm pumped.

Will it still be available on Itunes or Emusic, or would I have to put in a bunch of credit card info somewhere else?

Re: ZOMG!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Anonymous — Mon, 14 Feb 2011 07:49:13 GMT

Author: Anonymous

Posted: 02/14/2011 12:49

yeah i can see that actually at first i was thinking the King Of Limbs/King Is Dead connexion

Re: ZOMG!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Anonymous — Mon, 14 Feb 2011 07:25:02 GMT

Author: Anonymous

Posted: 02/14/2011 12:25

When I heard the title, I imagined the artwork to be like The Decemberists - The Hazards Of Love. 😜

Re: ZOMG!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Anonymous — Mon, 14 Feb 2011 07:19:54 GMT

Author: Anonymous

Posted: 02/14/2011 12:19

well i guess it will becom e world known once pitchfork puiblishes it 🤣

Re: ZOMG!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Anonymous — Mon, 14 Feb 2011 07:17:21 GMT

Author: Anonymous

Posted: 02/14/2011 12:17

I went onto the nme earlier and saw the news for that. I went straight over to best ever albums and no one had said a thing. I found that a little confusing.

I then come back a while later and see the title of this thread and think "yes, this is definitely the Radiohead news" 😄

ZOMG!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Anonymous — Mon, 14 Feb 2011 07:08:15 GMT

Author: Anonymous

Posted: 02/14/2011 12:08

http://www.thekingoflimbs.com/DIGBP.htm

has anyone else heard about this? GAHHHHHHH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

http://www.nme.com/news/radiohead/54951