Best Ever Albums

Re: Is there interest in increasing overall chart size?

albummaster — Fri, 2 Oct 2015 14:33:43 GMT

Author: albummaster

Posted: 10/02/2015 18:33

I'm not sure I totally understand the issue here, but year and decade charts have a much lower weight on the site than overall charts. An album ranked at 75 in the year will receive significantly less points than an album ranked 100 in the overall chart (year charts have a 5 point maximum & overall charts 100).

Re: Is there interest in increasing overall chart size?

samistake2ice — Thu, 1 Oct 2015 09:31:26 GMT

Author: samistake2ice

Posted: 10/01/2015 13:31

Yeah i agree with you. And i dont have an answer, but in the current year you sort of need the years to have points so you can track what ppl are listening to and enjoying.

I imagine this will get backlash (because, change) but i think there needs to be a more defined difference for credit given to albums in the 3 categories.

Something like: Albums in your overall being assigned a point value from 1000 - 100, decades from 100-10 and year from 10-1. Yes the number values for the most popular albums will sky rocket but the order will remain the same, and this way there is no overlap.

Re: Is there interest in increasing overall chart size?

PsychologistHD — Thu, 1 Oct 2015 08:36:49 GMT

Author: PsychologistHD

Posted: 10/01/2015 12:36

samistake2ice wrote:

Hmm, why do you say that?

Because of exactly the problem you mentioned. While it's different for year's like 2015 and a little bit backward, not even the forum regulars have listened to 100 albums from, say, 1983 (with a few exceptions), so most times it's just a catalogue of everything they've listened to that year. And for that, we give the same point system to stuff that ends up on the Decade or even Overall charts?

Re: Is there interest in increasing overall chart size?

samistake2ice — Thu, 1 Oct 2015 08:24:36 GMT

Author: samistake2ice

Posted: 10/01/2015 12:24

shaydndepriest wrote:

we shouldn't give points to year charts at all tbh. do we even still do that?

Hmm, why do you say that?

Re: Is there interest in increasing overall chart size?

PsychologistHD — Thu, 1 Oct 2015 00:05:31 GMT

Author: PsychologistHD

Posted: 10/01/2015 04:05

samistake2ice wrote:

Edit: I went back and realized this topic was already brought up in 2012 and I understand the reasons against. And I even agree with the fact that you should be able encompass your favorite albums with the current format. That being said, im still gonna post my original statement of nothing more than for the sake of argument.

Below was going to be my original post.

Probably only after a certain level is reached (tbd), but I've noticed a few ppl have custom chars for "overall honorable mentions. I think those albums should get the credit. This stems from the fact that i noticed how I can have a an album at say #75 of the year and it gets as many bea points as the album that got into the 100 spot of my overall.

Is anyone in agreement?

we shouldn't give points to year charts at all tbh. do we even still do that?

Is there interest in increasing overall chart size?

samistake2ice — Mon, 28 Sep 2015 15:18:36 GMT

Author: samistake2ice

Posted: 09/28/2015 19:18

Edit: I went back and realized this topic was already brought up in 2012 and I understand the reasons against. And I even agree with the fact that you should be able encompass your favorite albums with the current format. That being said, im still gonna post my original statement of nothing more than for the sake of argument.

Below was going to be my original post.

Probably only after a certain level is reached (tbd), but I've noticed a few ppl have custom chars for "overall honorable mentions. I think those albums should get the credit. This stems from the fact that i noticed how I can have a an album at say #75 of the year and it gets as many bea points as the album that got into the 100 spot of my overall.

Is anyone in agreement?