iTunes Sucks

Goto page Previous  1, 2
View previous topic :: View next topic
Author Message
luis




Location: Buenos Aires, ARG
Argentina

  • #11
  • Posted: 02/15/2011 05:30
  • Post subject: Re: iTunes Sucks
  • Reply with quote
HyperBully wrote:
mooseboy101 wrote:
HyperBully wrote:
Every problem mentioned above with iTunes is solved with foobar
Do you know how to add album artwork to songs in foobar?


Yup. Simply download the album art from the internet and put the image file in the folder where you keep the songs. This saves space and is better for organization than iTunes' embedding (copy & paste) method, and gives you more choice over what you want the album art to be. This can also be done automatically with a free tool called Album Art Downloader XUI, which has a "foobar browser" which scans your foobar2000 library and automatically downloads the artwork for each album to the directories where the songs are stored. For more information, see the following links:


http://www.foobar2000.org (foobar2000 official website, which has a nice FAQ and links to download a number of essential components)

http://wiki.hydrogenaudio.org/index.php...loader_XUI (Link with information about Album Art Downloader XUI and download link. The rest of the Wiki includes a number of other helpful articles on how to properly setup foobar2000.)


I didnt know fubar, but it checked the specs and looks way better than itunes. I dont own a Win XP computer so I cant try it.
_________________
And If a Double Decker Bus, Crashes into us...
Back to top
  • Visit poster's website
  • View user's profile
  • Send private message
HyperBully



Gender: Male
Location: US
United States

  • #12
  • Posted: 02/15/2011 21:40
  • Post subject: Re: iTunes Sucks
  • Reply with quote
luis wrote:
HyperBully wrote:
mooseboy101 wrote:
HyperBully wrote:
Every problem mentioned above with iTunes is solved with foobar
Do you know how to add album artwork to songs in foobar?


Yup. Simply download the album art from the internet and put the image file in the folder where you keep the songs. This saves space and is better for organization than iTunes' embedding (copy & paste) method, and gives you more choice over what you want the album art to be. This can also be done automatically with a free tool called Album Art Downloader XUI, which has a "foobar browser" which scans your foobar2000 library and automatically downloads the artwork for each album to the directories where the songs are stored. For more information, see the following links:


http://www.foobar2000.org (foobar2000 official website, which has a nice FAQ and links to download a number of essential components)

http://wiki.hydrogenaudio.org/index.php...loader_XUI (Link with information about Album Art Downloader XUI and download link. The rest of the Wiki includes a number of other helpful articles on how to properly setup foobar2000.)


I didnt know fubar, but it checked the specs and looks way better than itunes. I dont own a Win XP computer so I cant try it.


Do you have Vista or 7? It works on those, too. I use Windows 7. It just doesn't work with Mac or Linux. If you have one of those, there is a way to run it through programs like Wine, but I don't know much about how to do that.
Back to top
  • Visit poster's website
  • View user's profile
  • Send private message
luis




Location: Buenos Aires, ARG
Argentina

  • #13
  • Posted: 02/16/2011 06:56
  • Post subject: Re: iTunes Sucks
  • Reply with quote
HyperBully wrote:
luis wrote:
HyperBully wrote:
mooseboy101 wrote:
HyperBully wrote:
Every problem mentioned above with iTunes is solved with foobar
Do you know how to add album artwork to songs in foobar?


Yup. Simply download the album art from the internet and put the image file in the folder where you keep the songs. This saves space and is better for organization than iTunes' embedding (copy & paste) method, and gives you more choice over what you want the album art to be. This can also be done automatically with a free tool called Album Art Downloader XUI, which has a "foobar browser" which scans your foobar2000 library and automatically downloads the artwork for each album to the directories where the songs are stored. For more information, see the following links:


http://www.foobar2000.org (foobar2000 official website, which has a nice FAQ and links to download a number of essential components)

http://wiki.hydrogenaudio.org/index.php...loader_XUI (Link with information about Album Art Downloader XUI and download link. The rest of the Wiki includes a number of other helpful articles on how to properly setup foobar2000.)


I didnt know fubar, but it checked the specs and looks way better than itunes. I dont own a Win XP computer so I cant try it.


Do you have Vista or 7? It works on those, too. I use Windows 7. It just doesn't work with Mac or Linux. If you have one of those, there is a way to run it through programs like Wine, but I don't know much about how to do that.


I own a mac, I know that kind of apps that emulate Windows, it just that most of the apps dont work at all. I'll have to stick to itunes.
_________________
And If a Double Decker Bus, Crashes into us...
Back to top
  • Visit poster's website
  • View user's profile
  • Send private message
Bork
Executive Hillbilly



Location: Vinson Mountain, GA
United States

  • #14
  • Posted: 02/19/2011 17:27
  • Post subject:
  • Reply with quote
iTunes stinks, that is agreed. I use Winamp and am pretty happy with how it works, most of all that the player does not dictate to me how I should browse through or organize my record collection (which is one of the reasons wmp stinks too, the other is that when your collection gets large it does a lot of weird things).

Could you give me the case for Foobar over Winamp?
Back to top
  • Visit poster's website
  • View user's profile
  • Send private message
HyperBully



Gender: Male
Location: US
United States

  • #15
  • Posted: 02/19/2011 18:07
  • Post subject:
  • Reply with quote
Bork wrote:
iTunes stinks, that is agreed. I use Winamp and am pretty happy with how it works, most of all that the player does not dictate to me how I should browse through or organize my record collection (which is one of the reasons wmp stinks too, the other is that when your collection gets large it does a lot of weird things).

Could you give me the case for Foobar over Winamp?


Winamp is a good player and all, and was my previous default player before switching to foobar2000, but foobar does everything Winamp does and then some. It's infinitely more customizable than Winamp, consumes less memory, and has a number of really cool features that I've yet to find in any other player, some targeted to audiophiles and advanced users, others targeted to more basic users. I would suggest going to the foobar website and downloading and installing the player, reading up on the official FAQ, as well as the HydrogenAudio wiki and forums, and seeing for yourself just what the capabilities of foobar are that Winamp lacks. It may not seem so apparent from the surface, but once you dig deeper, you'll never go back to Winamp. That said, if you're perfectly happy with Winamp and are reluctant to start over with another music player, I can see why you'd want to stick with it, as foobar does take a certain amount of time and devotion to properly setup. Either way, at least you're not stuck using iTunes.
Back to top
  • Visit poster's website
  • View user's profile
  • Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   This topic is locked: you cannot edit posts or make replies.
All times are GMT
Goto page Previous  1, 2
Page 2 of 2


 

Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Similar Topics
Topic Author Forum
[ Poll ] Radiohead sucks GARY Music
Oh damn, this sucks. Guest Music
proof that new music sucks? telefunker Music
[ Poll ] Ambient Music Sucks! WEATLauncher Music
neutral milk hotel sucks hello Music

 
Back to Top