I hadn't heard Born to Die until a couple weeks before this came out, so I can't really speak to her past albums or trajectory as an artist. But the reason I like the new one way more than Born to Die is because of how restrained it feels. Born to Die has great hooks but it also has a lot of orchestral flourishes that sometimes do more harm than good. NFR has a dream pop vibe despite never really going into dream pop territory musically, and it's an album that totally relaxes me. I also think the sprawling, laid back instrumentation fits her voice much better. Born to Die has a nice dichotomy between her jaded, sometimes lazy (in a good way) vocals, but hearing them over music that is similarly restrained really helps to sell them. I also tend to think her vocals are really great despite them sounding kind of effortless; the closer is a tremendous vocal performance and her Leonard Cohen impression of "I'm your man" on Mariner's Apartment Complex is one of my favorite parts of the album.
I wouldn't really call this one more arty, whatever that means. I think there's more going on but I get the same overall vibe I get from Born to Die, just done better. And while I suppose there are fewer hooks, the hooks on The Next Best American Record, Bartender, and the closer always have me singing along. A lot of the other tracks have nice subtle hooks that blend together with the verses and kind of surprise you. I also think this one is more focused and nuanced lyrically, and the lyrical themes fit well for the current social climate. But that's not something I picked up on during my first listen.
FWIW this is my favorite album of the year, it really surprised me and I'm still finding things about it that I love on every listen. _________________ And it's hard to be a human being. And it's harder as anything else.
I finally listened to this. Going to give it a second try before fully passing judgment, but as of now my bewilderment is not too far off the thread title.
It's very good as I expected, but what really mystifies me is why everyone is talking about this as a quantum leap from her earlier work??? I don't see much of a difference in quality between Born To Die / Paradise and this. I guess I can see how it's more appealing to people who want something that sounds more 'arty' and has fewer catchy hooks. And that's a fairly prevalent view in online music communities. Fwiw I skipped Ultraviolence, Honeymoon, and Lust For Life. For those who have heard those, does this album have extra appeal as a comeback record of sorts?
I suppose in some way it does, but my stance has always been pretty warm for Lana. She had a solid debut which she followed with one of my favorite albums of 2014. Her follow-ups haven’t really lived up to the consistency of Ultraviolence. As I’ve grown older I’ve divorced myself from rapid fanbases, so I kind of take music as it is without any “hype” or “community acclaim” influencing my opinions. This is not to say there isn’t an appeal to come back with a good album after two lukewarm ones, but I think we’re overplaying things here.
I personally love born to die, and I have liked a handful of other Lana songs since that album. Until NFR I thought that Lana wasn't going to make another great album. This album definitely proved me wrong. So yeah, to me it is proof that she is a legit artist and it is not some kind of fluke.
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
