| |
|
View previous topic :: View next topic
|
|
| Author |
Message |
CA Dreamin
Gender: Male
Location: LA 
- #11
- Posted: 08/13/2020 17:41
- Post subject:
|
| albummaster wrote: | The answer might be some kind of weighting taking into account how much a chart has changed since the rating was made (some edits bigger than others) but maybe this is over complicating things. To be honest, I'm not a big fan of chart ratings per se as the lists are so personal to each user but do agree that ratings should reflect a reasonably up-to-date version of the chart.
Not sure about deleting old ratings, good points have been made about the impact that might have, and some old ratings are still valid if the chart hasn't been updated since the rating was made. Maybe a rating could be disallowed if more than half the chart has been updated since the rating was made (or something like that, but this would be quite complicated to add and the scale of an update is difficult to define e.g. if detailed comments have been added with no changes in rank etc). |
Likewise I think ratings should reflect up-to-date versions of charts. Heck that's why I brought it up. And I think many good proposals have been made. Factoring in weight with chart changes, or deleting ratings if a chart has undergone such significant change. Whatever makes the most sense and can be feasibly done.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|
|
| |
