I'm glad Laughing Stock had won. Otherwise I would have been depressed that I didn't vote for it (I forgot to vote in this particular match-up) when I had the chance.
JackwcQueen Of The ForumsProfile Aaaanywhere Sex: Incredible
Virgin Killers, whatever that is, may have a good cover, but Virgin Killer sure doesn't. But it IS amusing. And it got Wikipedia in trouble a bit, which is really funny, but..........well, it just isn't a good cover. Even some band member or something later said something about regretting that they had chosen it for a cover.
JackwcQueen Of The ForumsProfile Aaaanywhere Sex: Incredible
Virgin Killers, whatever that is, may have a good cover, but Virgin Killer sure doesn't. But it IS amusing. And it got Wikipedia in trouble a bit, which is really funny, but..........well, it just isn't a good cover. Even some band member or something later said something about regretting that they had chosen it for a cover.
Pfft, what do they know about art? Besides, there issue had more to do with the fact that the cover was misleading as to the meaning of the album's name; the piece as a whole is actually a pretty nice work of art. The piece is well composed, well balanced and has some nice contrast going on there. Laughing Stock on the other hand - it's far too symmetrical, and very rarely does symmetry make for engaging composition. And the colours just aren't doing it for me; very few times have I looked at such vivid colours yet still felt bored by them. They just aren't very well utilized. Overall, it just isn't a very impressive cover. _________________ A dick that's bigger than the sun.
The piece is well composed, well balanced and has some nice contrast going on there. .
You're joking, right? What it mostly is, is some piece of paedopornography, probably meant to shock cheap. I mean, who cares about "balance" or "contrast" when seeing this? What everybody sees is a very young girl, naked, with Virgin Killer written above her. Totally empty, would-be controversial stuff just to get your name uttered.
Virgin Killers, whatever that is, may have a good cover, but Virgin Killer sure doesn't. But it IS amusing. And it got Wikipedia in trouble a bit, which is really funny, but..........well, it just isn't a good cover. Even some band member or something later said something about regretting that they had chosen it for a cover.
Pfft, what do they know about art? Besides, there issue had more to do with the fact that the cover was misleading as to the meaning of the album's name; the piece as a whole is actually a pretty nice work of art. The piece is well composed, well balanced and has some nice contrast going on there. Laughing Stock on the other hand - it's far too symmetrical, and very rarely does symmetry make for engaging composition. And the colours just aren't doing it for me; very few times have I looked at such vivid colours yet still felt bored by them. They just aren't very well utilized. Overall, it just isn't a very impressive cover.
How the freaking rotten honey is Virgin Killer more "impressive" than Laughing Stock?
The piece is well composed, well balanced and has some nice contrast going on there. .
You're joking, right? What it mostly is, is some piece of paedopornography, probably meant to shock cheap. I mean, who cares about "balance" or "contrast" when seeing this? What everybody sees is a very young girl, naked, with Virgin Killer written above her. Totally empty, would-be controversial stuff just to get your name uttered.
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
Facetious
Jackwc
Norman Bates
