View previous topic :: View next topic
|
|
Poll: Which album art is better? |
|
|
|
|
Virgin Killer |
|
31% |
[6] |
Laughing Stock |
|
68% |
[13] |
|
|
|
|
|
Total Votes : 19 |
|
|
Author |
Message |
Facetious
Gender: Male
Age: 25
Location: Somewhere you've never been 
- #11
- Posted: 02/27/2012 13:31
- Post subject:
|
Applerill wrote: | Oh boy, more proof that Purple's a total perv
So yeah, as much as I dislike Talk Talk, I'd choose it over the crappy Virgin Killer any day. |
|
|
|
|
Facetious
Gender: Male
Age: 25
Location: Somewhere you've never been 
- #12
- Posted: 02/27/2012 13:33
- Post subject:
|
I'm glad Laughing Stock had won. Otherwise I would have been depressed that I didn't vote for it (I forgot to vote in this particular match-up) when I had the chance.
|
|
|
Jackwc
Queen Of The Forums
Location: Aaaanywhere Sex: Incredible 
- #13
- Posted: 02/27/2012 17:58
- Post subject:
|
Virgin killers is a good cover! A good cover! _________________ A dick that's bigger than the sun.
Music sucks. Check out my favourite movies, fam:
http://letterboxd.com/jackiegigantic/
|
|
|
Facetious
Gender: Male
Age: 25
Location: Somewhere you've never been 
- #14
- Posted: 02/28/2012 10:15
- Post subject:
|
Jackwc wrote: | Virgin killers is a good cover! A good cover! |
Virgin Killers, whatever that is, may have a good cover, but Virgin Killer sure doesn't. But it IS amusing. And it got Wikipedia in trouble a bit, which is really funny, but..........well, it just isn't a good cover. Even some band member or something later said something about regretting that they had chosen it for a cover.
|
|
|
Jackwc
Queen Of The Forums
Location: Aaaanywhere Sex: Incredible 
- #15
- Posted: 02/28/2012 16:23
- Post subject:
|
Eggman/Walrus/Taxman wrote: | Jackwc wrote: | Virgin killers is a good cover! A good cover! |
Virgin Killers, whatever that is, may have a good cover, but Virgin Killer sure doesn't. But it IS amusing. And it got Wikipedia in trouble a bit, which is really funny, but..........well, it just isn't a good cover. Even some band member or something later said something about regretting that they had chosen it for a cover. |
Pfft, what do they know about art? Besides, there issue had more to do with the fact that the cover was misleading as to the meaning of the album's name; the piece as a whole is actually a pretty nice work of art. The piece is well composed, well balanced and has some nice contrast going on there. Laughing Stock on the other hand - it's far too symmetrical, and very rarely does symmetry make for engaging composition. And the colours just aren't doing it for me; very few times have I looked at such vivid colours yet still felt bored by them. They just aren't very well utilized. Overall, it just isn't a very impressive cover. _________________ A dick that's bigger than the sun.
Music sucks. Check out my favourite movies, fam:
http://letterboxd.com/jackiegigantic/
|
|
|
|
Norman Bates
Gender: Male
Age: 52
Location: Paris, France 
- #16
- Posted: 02/28/2012 16:39
- Post subject:
|
Jackwc wrote: | The piece is well composed, well balanced and has some nice contrast going on there. . |
You're joking, right? What it mostly is, is some piece of paedopornography, probably meant to shock cheap. I mean, who cares about "balance" or "contrast" when seeing this? What everybody sees is a very young girl, naked, with Virgin Killer written above her. Totally empty, would-be controversial stuff just to get your name uttered.
|
|
|
Facetious
Gender: Male
Age: 25
Location: Somewhere you've never been 
- #17
- Posted: 02/29/2012 10:27
- Post subject:
|
Jackwc wrote: | Eggman/Walrus/Taxman wrote: | Jackwc wrote: | Virgin killers is a good cover! A good cover! |
Virgin Killers, whatever that is, may have a good cover, but Virgin Killer sure doesn't. But it IS amusing. And it got Wikipedia in trouble a bit, which is really funny, but..........well, it just isn't a good cover. Even some band member or something later said something about regretting that they had chosen it for a cover. |
Pfft, what do they know about art? Besides, there issue had more to do with the fact that the cover was misleading as to the meaning of the album's name; the piece as a whole is actually a pretty nice work of art. The piece is well composed, well balanced and has some nice contrast going on there. Laughing Stock on the other hand - it's far too symmetrical, and very rarely does symmetry make for engaging composition. And the colours just aren't doing it for me; very few times have I looked at such vivid colours yet still felt bored by them. They just aren't very well utilized. Overall, it just isn't a very impressive cover. |
How the freaking rotten honey is Virgin Killer more "impressive" than Laughing Stock?
|
|
|
Facetious
Gender: Male
Age: 25
Location: Somewhere you've never been 
- #18
- Posted: 02/29/2012 10:28
- Post subject:
|
Norman Bates wrote: | Jackwc wrote: | The piece is well composed, well balanced and has some nice contrast going on there. . |
You're joking, right? What it mostly is, is some piece of paedopornography, probably meant to shock cheap. I mean, who cares about "balance" or "contrast" when seeing this? What everybody sees is a very young girl, naked, with Virgin Killer written above her. Totally empty, would-be controversial stuff just to get your name uttered. |
|
|
|
|
 |
All times are GMT
|
Page 2 of 2 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|
|