For clarification - are you saying the solo artist is better than the original band, or are you saying them going solo allowed that artist to shine just as well if not better than the original band?
I think George Harrison's All Things Must Pass allowed him to explode, whereas Paul's and John's post-Beatle work... it's hard to say if it was better than their Beatle work for some of it, and some of it was just terrible.
Also Eddie Vedder's soundtrack into the wild is for me just as enjoyable as any Pearl Jam work.
The second side of Foo Fighters' In Your Honor was supposed to be solo work by Dave Grohl - I liked that acoustic work he did.
For clarification - are you saying the solo artist is better than the original band, or are you saying them going solo allowed that artist to shine just as well if not better than the original band?
I think George Harrison's All Things Must Pass allowed him to explode, whereas Paul's and John's post-Beatle work... it's hard to say if it was better than their Beatle work for some of it, and some of it was just terrible.
Also Eddie Vedder's soundtrack into the wild is for me just as enjoyable as any Pearl Jam work.
The second side of Foo Fighters' In Your Honor was supposed to be solo work by Dave Grohl - I liked that acoustic work he did.
I guess I meant that their solo stuff was better than their band stuff. Not that they were better than the bands necessarily. Butjust made better records after. Or either.
Kinda obvious choice but Michael Jackson _________________ Nothing really matters, anyone can see, nothing really matters, nothing really matters to me.
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
bobbyb5
SquishypuffDave
RoundTheBend
hereforashortime
