Let It Be. One of the most well known albums of all time. But was the decision to produce with Phil Spector better than the option of staying with loyal producer George Martin.
So which is better
Let It Be with Spector or without? _________________ Back after a while
Ignore the comment section for the "Let It Be"-album by The Replacements. The greatest album called "Let It Be" is made by The Beatles.
I can't tell what I prefer, I still haven't heard the naked version! _________________ "The Beatles, the greatest band known to mankind." - Bismah Mughal
A mix of both: the Spector overdubs, I could do without, but as far as his mixing job is concerned, he did great.
On the Naked... version, I miss the dialogue snippets between songs, but it does include "Don't let me down" so... tough choice.
Both are average. The Naked version sucks less though. I love Spector, but he put just too much Chantilly in there, anbd the songs weren't so strong to begin with.
A mix of both: the Spector overdubs, I could do without, but as far as his mixing job is concerned, he did great.
On the Naked... version, I miss the dialogue snippets between songs, but it does include "Don't let me down" so... tough choice.
Why do all these people think The Beatles need their constant defense of them? I like The Beatles, I just prefer The Replacements' 'Let It Be' to any one Beatles album. Calm down Huret.
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
sheep21
Mother Nature's Son
Norman Bates
Facetious
