I've given some thought to it, and I'll only do it if people are into it. So far, I've got one rule, and the rest will come later.
What this is about: how vital was each nominee to his/her band?
Rule 1: when nominating, you can pick ONE band that the nominee was in, and there will be votes on how vital that person was to that particular band. You cannot judge by any other band. Example: if J nominate Jimmy Page for Led Zeppelin, you cannot judge Page's work on other bands.
Rule 2: People can nominate four band members. All nominees from a certain user must all be from different bands.
If the nominee has been in two or more different bands, a user cannot nominate anyone else from any of the bands. However, other users may nominate people from that band.
Example: User 1 nominates Paul McCartney from The Beatlss, and cannot nominate anyone else from Beatles or Wings. User 2 nominates Lennon, and cannot nominate anyone else from Beatles or Plastic Ono Band.
Rule 3: There will be 64 nominations and no more. If this is popular, I may do it again next year with more nominations.
Rule 4: The polls will last only 1 day.
So what do you guys think? Should I do it?
Last edited by JMan on 06/14/2013 03:25; edited 5 times in total
Cymro2011The Beatles were objectively averageProfile In a deep, dark bubblegum graveyard
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
Cymro2011
MrFrogger
Jasonconfused
ScottyBaboon
