The Big What Ifs...
|
View previous topic :: View next topic
|
|
| Author |
Message |
- #31
- Posted: 09/11/2013 17:11
- Post subject:
|
EDIT: I'm dumb.
Last edited by Guest on 09/11/2013 17:14; edited 1 time in total
|
|
|
|
|
|
- #32
- Posted: 09/11/2013 17:12
- Post subject:
|
EDIT: ^ He's dumb.
Last edited by Guest on 09/11/2013 17:16; edited 2 times in total
|
|
|
|
- #33
- Posted: 09/11/2013 17:12
- Post subject:
|
EDIT: I'm dumb again.
Last edited by Guest on 09/11/2013 17:14; edited 3 times in total
|
|
|
|
Listmeister
Gender: Male
Location: Ohio 
- #34
- Posted: 09/11/2013 17:12
- Post subject:
|
| lethalnezzle wrote: | What am I reading?
Anyway, Bob Dylan does have a pretty voice, maybe not conventionally, but pretty to me. It brings to mind a far clearer story and much more interesting imagery than Lightfoot's snoring. Also, assuming that he had a conventionally pretty voice, he still would've written great songs, because as an artist he wanted to challenge himself and others, musically and lyrically. He wasn't simply content with releasing MOR hogwash with the aim of offending the least amount of people possible, as Mr. Lightfoot clearly was. He was an artist, not simply a cheap knock-off merchant. His songs were vast Renaissance frescos, Lightfoot's merely cheap, ship-in-a-bottle type tat, and Dylan having a conventionally pretty voice would not have been a catalyst for him being an artist as unassuming as the largely forgettable and almost intolerably bland Gordon fucking Lightfoot. In short, no. |
In all seriousness, that was a clear and eloquent answer, and now I understand what you were saying no to. Sorry I had to get all snarky to pull it out of you.
I'm going to drop it now.
|
|
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|
|
| |
