I think reviving a thread that's a few months old is ok, but a thread that's four years old is not. The members that wrote a thread that's four years old, for the most part, probably won't be here any more. A thread that's a few months old and still topical, I've no problem with being revived (personally). Obviously, not everyone thinks the same so that's just my own view.
I think reviving a thread that's a few months old is ok, but a thread that's four years old is not. The members that wrote a thread that's four years old, for the most part, probably won't be here any more. A thread that's a few months old and still topical, I've no problem with being revived (personally). Obviously, not everyone thinks the same so that's just my own view.
That sounds to me like we might need an 'archive' sub-category as well... to park any threads that are over x months old. It means people can go back and read them but they aren't active to add comments to.
I think reviving a thread that's a few months old is ok, but a thread that's four years old is not. The members that wrote a thread that's four years old, for the most part, probably won't be here any more. A thread that's a few months old and still topical, I've no problem with being revived (personally). Obviously, not everyone thinks the same so that's just my own view.
That sounds to me like we might need an 'archive' sub-category as well... to park any threads that are over x months old. It means people can go back and read them but they aren't active to add comments to.
I think reviving a thread that's a few months old is ok, but a thread that's four years old is not. The members that wrote a thread that's four years old, for the most part, probably won't be here any more. A thread that's a few months old and still topical, I've no problem with being revived (personally). Obviously, not everyone thinks the same so that's just my own view.
That sounds to me like we might need an 'archive' sub-category as well... to park any threads that are over x months old. It means people can go back and read them but they aren't active to add comments to.
The archive thing is quite easy to do. I just need to flick a switch. Maybe if a thread hasn't been responded to for at least a year, it should be archived/closed?
I think reviving a thread that's a few months old is ok, but a thread that's four years old is not. The members that wrote a thread that's four years old, for the most part, probably won't be here any more. A thread that's a few months old and still topical, I've no problem with being revived (personally). Obviously, not everyone thinks the same so that's just my own view.
That sounds to me like we might need an 'archive' sub-category as well... to park any threads that are over x months old. It means people can go back and read them but they aren't active to add comments to.
No comments to add to old threads? NO. 🤐
I like the archive idea though. 😁 Good one.
That kind of defeats the object of 'archive'....
🤣 Why do you think I even disliked the idea of no comments being added to old threads?............
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
GARY
albummaster
Facetious
