The only thing with that list is that they aren't ranked. Without ranking scores, I don't really see how much this list would add in terms of determining rank scores which are based on chart position.
The only thing with that list is that they aren't ranked. Without ranking scores, I don't really see how much this list would add in terms of determining rank scores which are based on chart position.
agree with joannajewsom, no way of assigning points if none of the list is ranked. Time's list was rejected for the same reason.
albummaster
Yeah, somehow I feel that lists are much better when they're ordered in rank by some criterias. That's why it kinda bothers me to know that Classic Rock Magazine's "50 Albums that Built Prog Rock" was also unordered, too. _________________ Music is the harmony of life. Without it, life would be a tasteless thing.
I have a "1001", the 2005 edition. I have added to my writings. I have also listed the artists and bands whose albums do not have the book. "1001", I think is sustainable, however, to read. I donยดt need rankings list. _________________ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MNGpsnTCUXM
It's a wonderful book ๐ They have a even newer edition now. No Journal For Plague Lovers in 2009 though which was a disappointment. Around 2009 and 2010 most of the choices were the higher placing ones from here. Only real surprise was Queen Of Denmark being included and this other one I never heard of. Everything else may have been in the top 20 for their year.
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum