| |
|
View previous topic :: View next topic
|
|
| Author |
Message |
Guest
Happy 55th BEAnniversary!
- #11
- Posted: 07/09/2013 17:50
- Post subject:
|
| EyeKanFly wrote: | | That being said, I've seen user charts with 10 Beatles albums in them that are perfectly legitimate charts, so where does the line get drawn? |
Maybe not an exact number but a percentage. New members can only add 40, and it's obvious when a new member has around 8 so Radiohead albums. So maybe the line should be drawn somewhere around 15%.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Guest
Happy 55th BEAnniversary!
- #12
- Posted: 07/09/2013 17:51
- Post subject:
|
| BrandonMeow wrote: | | Maybe if their chart is over 25% one artist? |
damn you
|
|
|
|
gtroda
Happy 55th BEAnniversary!
- #13
- Posted: 07/09/2013 17:52
- Post subject:
|
|
Great improvements albummaster. I am amazed people think of doing things like this just to game the system.
|
|
|
|
Guest
Happy 55th BEAnniversary!
- #14
- Posted: 07/09/2013 17:53
- Post subject:
|
|
If there's something that can be exploited, it will be exploited.
|
|
|
|
Guest
Happy 55th BEAnniversary!
- #15
- Posted: 07/09/2013 17:53
- Post subject:
|
😎 I love you too. 🤣
|
|
|
|
|
|
Guest
Happy 55th BEAnniversary!
- #16
- Posted: 07/09/2013 17:57
- Post subject:
|
|
Your post was better than mine, anyway. Once sentence verse three to make the same point.
|
|
|
|
albummaster
Janitor
Gender: Male
Site Admin
|
EyeKanFly
Head Bear Master/Galactic Emperor
Age: 34
Location: Gotham 
- #18
- Posted: 07/10/2013 13:37
- Post subject:
|
I haven't been here as long as you all, but my impression would be that (most of) these people aren't trying to exploit the system, but rather just doing their own thing with their charts (and then forgetting about it and leaving the site). That being said if the "Top 40 Greatest Music Albums" is being used for something other than the user's top 40 albums, it probably shouldn't be counted in the rank score.
_________________
51 Washington, D.C. albums!
|
|
|
|
- #19
- Posted: 07/10/2013 19:47
- Post subject:
|
|
agree about not using the one-year-ones in the rank, disagree about the one-artist-ones. but then again; what's really the difference? none. we suggest there is something fishy when a girl loves only one singer or only music from 1948 makes her heart go jumping, we won't allow it? so: how many years must be included in an overall-chart or how many artists must a girl prefer? i complained about this last year, though, seeing that too many albums did well in the 2012 chart despite only being in a handful lists. i know albummaster will come up with the sensiest solution here, anywho. forgive my rambling
|
|
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|
|
| |
