Scaruffi: Beatles ('Not forgotten to be ignored'), Velvet Underground #1
Scaruffi wrote: If somebody had not invented "beatlemania" in 1963, you would not have wasted five minutes of your time to read a page about such a trivial band.🤥 _________________ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MNGpsnTCUXM
VU are the better band, with a wider musical range, experimenting way more than the Beatles (the White album is a mess anyway). Their first 4 albums are completely different and groundbreaking in their own way. _________________ I'll be your plastic toy.
Recently realised how much I've fallen out of love with VU. I never liked the 3rd or the 4th album and though I initially loved WL/WH the most I now don't like/listen to it and VU+N is rapidly sliding down in my esteem. I think I just find them cold and emotionless now.
I think The Beatles had plenty of great albums, sounds, cultural influence and they didn't have Squeeze to their name. So The Beatles by a big margin.
Anybody who analyses and and enjoys music objectively and has their critical faculties intact, can possibly rate the Beatles as anything other than a bunch of second-rate musicians at worse or average musicians at best. To put them up against the Velvet Underground is simply a joke.
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
Hayden
RFNAPLES
SquishypuffDave
alelsupreme
cartoken
CellarDoor
