Goto page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8  Next
View previous topic :: View next topic
RockyRaccoon
Is it solipsistic in here or is it just me?
Gender: Male

Age: 34

Location: Maryland
United States

Moderator
  • View user's profile
  • #1
  • Posted: 08/17/2016 12:47
  • Post subject: Point of Discussion: Separating The Artist From Their Art
  • Reply with quote
POINT OF DISCUSSION

This is Point of Discussion, a thread for people to discuss issues and topics related to music in a thoughtful and productive way. The goal of this is to make you think, to make you take a look at what you believe, why you believe it, and what others believe. Good discussion is the key to any society, and this is a place where, hopefully, that can be fostered.

All of that being said, there are a few guidelines.

The Guidelines:

    1. Don't be a dick - it's fairly simple, just be civil. Say what you want, believe what you want to believe, that's fine, just don't be a dick about it.
    2. All opinions are welcome - no matter how unpopular you may think your opinion is (or how unpopular it eventually proves to be), post it. It's welcome. Just be prepared to defend that opinion if it's challenged.
    3. There are no wrong opinions - like, it's literally impossible. These are opinions, so no matter how strongly you feel about it, it's neither right nor wrong, it's just an opinion, so keep that in mind.
    4. The conversation can go anywhere - even if the discussion goes off of the original topic, that's fine. All kinds of tangents are possible, just try to keep it semi-relevant.




The Topic:

It's been a year and a half since I first posted this topic, so I thought we'd bring it up again since we have some new users (and it's a forever-talked about topic).

When listening to music, or experiencing any art at all, should one attempt to separate the art from the artist? Is that even possible? For example, many people don't like Kanye's music because he's a dick of a person. Is that relevant? Or should his music be viewed for what it is, outside of his personality?

Also, is the artist's intentions in making their work of art relevant to the piece itself? Is that something one should be aware of before experiencing/viewing/listening to that work?
_________________
Progressive Rock

Early Psychedelic Rock

Live Albums
Applerill
Autistic Princess <3
Gender: Female

Age: 31

Location: Chicago
United States
  • View user's profile
  • #2
  • Posted: 08/17/2016 13:34
  • Post subject:
  • Reply with quote
I'm way too tired to talk about the main topic coherently, but it always irks me when people talk about Kanye in this topic. So many of the people who make that argument love Eric Clapton, even though so many of the things he's said at concerts are literal hate speech against minorities. But for some reason, if a super-hard-working black man has any confidence in his opinions, he's taken as a monster by those same people.
(Oh, and Eric Clapton's music almost uniformly sucks, too)
Allabaster
  • #3
  • Posted: 08/17/2016 13:55
  • Post subject:
  • Reply with quote
I do not think it is appropriate to force an artist to separate from their work. Our leisure should not take priority over the rights of others, even if there is a very great amount of hype.
RockyRaccoon
Is it solipsistic in here or is it just me?
Gender: Male

Age: 34

Location: Maryland
United States

Moderator
  • View user's profile
  • #4
  • Posted: 08/17/2016 14:03
  • Post subject:
  • Reply with quote
Applerill wrote:
So many of the people who make that argument love Eric Clapton, even though so many of the things he's said at concerts are literal hate speech against minorities. But for some reason, if a super-hard-working black man has any confidence in his opinions, he's taken as a monster by those same people.


That's a good point. Do you think some artists are given passes for being dicks while others aren't?
_________________
Progressive Rock

Early Psychedelic Rock

Live Albums
Applerill
Autistic Princess <3
Gender: Female

Age: 31

Location: Chicago
United States
  • View user's profile
  • #5
  • Posted: 08/17/2016 14:45
  • Post subject:
  • Reply with quote
RockyRaccoon wrote:
That's a good point. Do you think some artists are given passes for being dicks while others aren't?


Well duh, but that's our world. This is really not a very exciting context for this discussion, though.

As I'm sure I've stated before on here, very much of the main question is related to the relative merits and pitfalls of auteur theory and intentional fallacy. There are countless structuralist and post-structuralist ways to break these two things down into their individual merits, but to sum up a middle-ground between the two in a really simplistic manner, both analysis and fun are super-important, and just like with the food you eat, you should hopefully have a diet of both.

Of course, oftentimes the "enjoyment" and the artistic context coalesce*, not only for all the positive narrative contexts that make something legendary (for those wonderful stories shape the classics we love as much as the music itself), but even the negative things. I think we could agree that Varg is a horrible human being, but his best albums as Burzum are about that darkness inside his soul, and in consequence is about our own darkness. (You could say the same thing about Woody Allen's best movies).

*There's another idea I have regarding "literary" and "genre" music that might tie in here, as the latter is much less dependent (often for the better, as having to decode things all the time can be drag when you just want to shake your butt or cool down) on cultural context and semiotic intention. But in general, Zappa was right in that "art is the frame", and the artist's auteurist context is indeed a big part of that frame most of the time.
Tap
to resume download
Gender: Female

Age: 40

United States
  • View user's profile
  • #6
  • Posted: 08/17/2016 15:48
  • Post subject:
  • Reply with quote
Last year I was really digging this Charles Cohen album, but then he got busted for soliciting sex from an undercover officer posing as a 14 year old on craigslist. I know those stings are a complicated issue, but still, I don't think a 14 year old can consent to sex, and so it's just really clearly a wrong thing to do. I'm still able to listen to separate the art from the artist just fine with people from the past, but there's something about experiencing the betrayal of my own values after getting into something that just completely kills the art for me, and I can't enjoy the experience of listening to that Cohen album anymore.
AAL2014

United States
  • View user's profile
  • #7
  • Posted: 08/17/2016 17:47
  • Post subject:
  • Reply with quote
To sum up the original question.. I believe music in it's purest form is and should be a reflection of the artist so we have to take the art with the artist as is or at very least attempt to.

Taking Kanye for example.. I always do my best to separate Kanye the great artist/rapper/producer and Kanye the airhead but I'm starting to accept the fact that Kanye would not be making the same art if one molecule was out of place. Again, music, or any type of art at it's purest form should be a reflection of the artist. So why I should I try to convince someone that they might like Kanye's music when it's HIM making it? I think Kanye believes he is making art and being an artist 24/7. Any time you see him in the news saying something outlandish or on...*shudders* Keeping Up with the Kardashians, there's no off switch, he's attempting to expand his artistry all the time. I may not like everything he does (both personally or musically) but I have to respect him for living his art.
_________________
Attention all planets of the solar federation: We have assumed control.
dihansse
dihansse
Gender: Male

Age: 62

Belgium
  • View user's profile
  • #8
  • Posted: 08/17/2016 17:59
  • Post subject:
  • Reply with quote
In Europe there is now a major discussion about Jesse Hughes, the singer of the Eagles of Death Metal who so nearly escaped real death in the Paris music club Bataclan. Because of a number of redneck outings (in different interviews he said that the French had only themselves to blame because of their liberal opinions and their ban on weapons) and his band is now banned from a number of French festivals.
Reasons quotes in his favour are:
- he has suffered so much in the Bataclan he is entitled to air some strong opinions
- he has grown up in redneck country so he can't help himself

But this nothing to do with his music. There are so many artists which have doen something wrong (Jerry Lee Lewis for marrying his minor niece, Bertrand Cantat of Noir Desir for murder, Michael Jackson for nearly everything, aso and there are many more examples in all kinds of arts) and I do agree that it does play a role (For me it's impossible to hear Helter Slelter withouten thinking about Charles Manson) but it shouldn't.
meccalecca
Voice of Reason
Gender: Male

Location: The Land of Enchantment
United States
  • View user's profile
  • #9
  • Posted: 08/17/2016 18:16
  • Post subject:
  • Reply with quote
I think part of it is how much of the artist's personal life and personality inhabit their art. Since he's been brought up, it's especially hard to separate the artist from the art in relation to Kanye since the line is so blurred. His enormous ego is all throughout his work. I'd say Woody Allen's a similar situation. It's hard to separate his lust for underage women from his films, since his sexual frustration is such a major aspect of his films.

On the other hand, Polanski's sexual abuse of a minor is easier to separate from his filmography since that part of his personality doesn't so directly inhabit his films.
_________________
http://jonnyleather.com
RockyRaccoon
Is it solipsistic in here or is it just me?
Gender: Male

Age: 34

Location: Maryland
United States

Moderator
  • View user's profile
  • #10
  • Posted: 08/17/2016 19:37
  • Post subject:
  • Reply with quote
meccalecca wrote:
I think part of it is how much of the artist's personal life and personality inhabit their art. Since he's been brought up, it's especially hard to separate the artist from the art in relation to Kanye since the line is so blurred. His enormous ego is all throughout his work. I'd say Woody Allen's a similar situation. It's hard to separate his lust for underage women from his films, since his sexual frustration is such a major aspect of his films.

On the other hand, Polanski's sexual abuse of a minor is easier to separate from his filmography since that part of his personality doesn't so directly inhabit his films.


I think this really speaks to the difficulty of separating the artist from the art. If the artist puts a lot of themselves (and especially their flaws) into their art, then you're constantly reminded of that artist, whereas if they don't, you're experiencing the art for what it is.

The question I think I'm trying to hone in on is, should we separate the artist from the art? Is art independent of its creator, or entirely dependent on its creator? When I listen to Charles Manson's album, should I care that Charles Manson is the one who created the music, or should I just enjoy the music for what it is?
_________________
Progressive Rock

Early Psychedelic Rock

Live Albums
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   This topic is locked: you cannot edit posts or make replies.
All times are GMT
Goto page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8  Next
Page 1 of 8


 

Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Similar Topics
Topic Author Forum
Sticky: Artist not listed kufuhder New Members
Point of Discussion: The Artist and t... RockyRaccoon Music
Separating the Art From the Artist. Gershyn Music
Point of Discussion Puncture Repair Music
Point of Discussion: Topics RockyRaccoon Music

 
Back to Top