| |
|
View previous topic :: View next topic
|
|
| Author |
Message |
RFNAPLES
Level 8
Gender: Male
Age: 76
Location: Durham, NC, USA 
- #1
- Posted: 12/09/2012 00:32
- Post subject: About chart of the day
|
"About chart of the day: The BestEverAlbums.com chart of the day is randomly selected from all charts of at least 50 entries (and divisible by ten). Charts are only selected if they have a minimum average rating of 75 out of 100 from at least 10 votes, and must have been updated in the last 180 days. In addition, a chart must allow member feedback for it to be eligible to be selected."
Why must a chart be divisible by ten? I know at one time somebody suggested that this would eliminate charts in progress. But does it? Why should I list 60 albums in a decade that includes only 51 great albums or eliminate one of the great albums to make 50? Does the artificial limit cause junk albums to be added to be included in COTD? What is wrong with a chart containing a natural breaking point of 75 albums? Can't charts in progress just not be made public as determined by the author?
_________________
Top 100 Greatest Music Albums by RFNAPLES
Bubbling Under The Top 100 Greatest Mus...y RFNAPLES
|
|
|
|
|
|
albummaster
Janitor
Gender: Male
Location: Spain
Site Admin
- #2
- Posted: 12/09/2012 14:58
- Post subject: Re: About chart of the day
|
| RFNAPLES wrote: |
Why must a chart be divisible by ten? I know at one time somebody suggested that this would eliminate charts in progress. But does it? Why should I list 60 albums in a decade that includes only 51 great albums or eliminate one of the great albums to make 50? Does the artificial limit cause junk albums to be added to be included in COTD? What is wrong with a chart containing a natural breaking point of 75 albums? Can't charts in progress just not be made public as determined by the author? |
it just looks neater.
|
|
|
|
RFNAPLES
Level 8
Gender: Male
Age: 76
Location: Durham, NC, USA
|
- #4
- Posted: 12/09/2012 16:32
- Post subject:
|
|
One reason to like BEA over RYM is because it looks neater.
|
|
|
|
RFNAPLES
Level 8
Gender: Male
Age: 76
Location: Durham, NC, USA
|
|
|
19loveless91
mag. druž. inf
- #6
- Posted: 12/09/2012 17:00
- Post subject: Re: About chart of the day
|
| RFNAPLES wrote: |
Why should I list 60 albums in a decade that includes only 51 great albums ... |
You are one funny dude
|
|
|
|
- #7
- Posted: 12/09/2012 17:07
- Post subject:
|
|
Which decade, post-50's, contains less than one hundred great albums?
|
|
|
|
RFNAPLES
Level 8
Gender: Male
Age: 76
Location: Durham, NC, USA
|
- #9
- Posted: 12/09/2012 17:33
- Post subject:
|
| RFNAPLES wrote: | | IMO, 1980s-2010s. None of my decade charts for those decades list 100. |
Fair enough. I'm amazed you think that though. You should listen to more stuff.
|
|
|
|
RFNAPLES
Level 8
Gender: Male
Age: 76
Location: Durham, NC, USA
|
|
|
|
  |
All times are GMT
|
| Page 1 of 2 |
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|
|
| |
