I Luv I Jah (track)
by Bad Brains
I Luv I Jah appears on the following album(s) by Bad Brains:
- Bad Brains (track #14) (this album) (1982)
- The Omega Sessions (track #3) (1997)
- Banned In D.C.: Bad Brains Greatest Riffs (track #20) (compilation) (2003)
Upcoming concerts
Listen to I Luv I Jah on YouTube
I Luv I Jah ratings
Average Rating = (n ÷ (n + m)) × av + (m ÷ (n + m)) × AVwhere:
av = trimmed mean average rating an item has currently received.
n = number of ratings an item has currently received.
m = minimum number of ratings required for an item to appear in a 'top-rated' chart (currently 10).
AV = the site mean average rating.
| Rating | Date updated | Member | Track ratings | Avg. track rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ! | 11/17/2025 16:26 | Exist-en-ciel | 28,899 | 71/100 |
| ! | 05/13/2025 03:23 | culwin | 19,524 | 75/100 |
| ! | 04/28/2025 12:00 | Siromynian | 15,175 | 71/100 |
| ! | 03/04/2024 17:42 |  Jboy56 | 39,199 | 78/100 |
| ! | 07/09/2023 13:34 |  VictorVale | 42,935 | 88/100 |
Rating metrics:
Outliers can be removed when calculating a mean average to dampen the effects of ratings outside the normal distribution. This figure is provided as the trimmed mean. A high standard deviation can be legitimate, but can sometimes indicate 'gaming' is occurring. Consider a simplified example* of an item receiving ratings of 100, 50, & 0. The mean average rating would be 50. However, ratings of 55, 50 & 45 could also result in the same average. The second average might be more trusted because there is more consensus around a particular rating (a lower deviation).
(*In practice, some tracks can have several thousand ratings)
This track has a Bayesian average rating of 76.1/100, a mean average of 76.1/100, and a trimmed mean (excluding outliers) of 76.1/100. The standard deviation for this track is 14.7.
I Luv I Jah comments
Be the first to add a comment for this track - add your comment!
Your feedback for I Luv I Jah
A lot of hard work happens in the background to keep BEA running, and it's especially difficult to do this when we can't pay our hosting fees :(
We work very hard to ensure our site is as fast (and FREE!) as possible, and we respect your privacy.
