Chicago (track)
by Tom Waits
Chicago appears on the following album(s) by Tom Waits:
- Bad As Me (track #1) (this album) (2011)
eBay
Condition: Like New
Upcoming concerts
Listen to Chicago on YouTube
Chicago ratings
Average Rating = (n ÷ (n + m)) × av + (m ÷ (n + m)) × AVwhere:
av = trimmed mean average rating an item has currently received.
n = number of ratings an item has currently received.
m = minimum number of ratings required for an item to appear in a 'top-rated' chart (currently 10).
AV = the site mean average rating.
Showing latest 5 ratings for this track. | Show all 38 ratings for this track.
| Rating | Date updated | Member | Track ratings | Avg. track rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 06/03/2024 23:26 | BlueNote | 2,505 | 72/100 | |
| 04/15/2024 20:20 | phmusic | 62,861 | 100/100 | |
| 02/05/2024 06:00 |  marazico | 655 | 81/100 | |
| 01/31/2024 22:38 | r0b07 | 627 | 90/100 | |
| 12/24/2021 13:01 | Fertu | 40,982 | 82/100 |
Rating metrics:
Outliers can be removed when calculating a mean average to dampen the effects of ratings outside the normal distribution. This figure is provided as the trimmed mean. A high standard deviation can be legitimate, but can sometimes indicate 'gaming' is occurring. Consider a simplified example* of an item receiving ratings of 100, 50, & 0. The mean average rating would be 50. However, ratings of 55, 50 & 45 could also result in the same average. The second average might be more trusted because there is more consensus around a particular rating (a lower deviation).
(*In practice, some tracks can have several thousand ratings)
This track is rated in the top 4% of all tracks on BestEverAlbums.com. This track has a Bayesian average rating of 81.6/100, a mean average of 80.9/100, and a trimmed mean (excluding outliers) of 83.1/100. The standard deviation for this track is 18.2.
Chicago comments
Be the first to add a comment for this track - add your comment!
Your feedback for Chicago
A lot of hard work happens in the background to keep BEA running, and it's especially difficult to do this when we can't pay our hosting fees :(
We work very hard to ensure our site is as fast (and FREE!) as possible, and we respect your privacy.
