No One Has (track)
by Mudhoney
No One Has appears on the following album(s) by Mudhoney:
- Superfuzz Bigmuff (track #4) (this album) (1988)
- Superfuzz Bigmuff Plus Early Singles (track #7) (compilation) (1990)
Upcoming concerts
Listen to No One Has on YouTube
No One Has ratings
Average Rating = (n ÷ (n + m)) × av + (m ÷ (n + m)) × AVwhere:
av = trimmed mean average rating an item has currently received.
n = number of ratings an item has currently received.
m = minimum number of ratings required for an item to appear in a 'top-rated' chart (currently 10).
AV = the site mean average rating.
| Rating | Date updated | Member | Track ratings | Avg. track rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ! | 07/03/2025 18:15 | spinout | 38,017 | 83/100 |
| ! | 01/29/2025 09:56 | Jboy69 | 833 | 78/100 |
| ! | 08/10/2024 15:00 | Pluto11 | 26,981 | 76/100 |
| ! | 05/20/2024 17:20 | Fevernova | 34,263 | 82/100 |
| ! | 01/01/2024 18:03 | daCritic | 34,113 | 76/100 |
Rating metrics:
Outliers can be removed when calculating a mean average to dampen the effects of ratings outside the normal distribution. This figure is provided as the trimmed mean. A high standard deviation can be legitimate, but can sometimes indicate 'gaming' is occurring. Consider a simplified example* of an item receiving ratings of 100, 50, & 0. The mean average rating would be 50. However, ratings of 55, 50 & 45 could also result in the same average. The second average might be more trusted because there is more consensus around a particular rating (a lower deviation).
(*In practice, some tracks can have several thousand ratings)
This track is rated in the top 7% of all tracks on BestEverAlbums.com. This track has a Bayesian average rating of 79.5/100, a mean average of 80.8/100, and a trimmed mean (excluding outliers) of 80.8/100. The standard deviation for this track is 9.8.
No One Has comments
Be the first to add a comment for this track - add your comment!
Your feedback for No One Has
A lot of hard work happens in the background to keep BEA running, and it's especially difficult to do this when we can't pay our hosting fees :(
We work very hard to ensure our site is as fast (and FREE!) as possible, and we respect your privacy.
