Ziggomatic 17 (track)
by Aphex Twin
Ziggomatic 17 appears on the following album(s) by Aphex Twin:
- Drukqs (track #28) (this album) (2001)
Listen to Ziggomatic 17 on YouTube
Ziggomatic 17 ratings
Average Rating = (n ÷ (n + m)) × av + (m ÷ (n + m)) × AVwhere:
av = trimmed mean average rating an item has currently received.
n = number of ratings an item has currently received.
m = minimum number of ratings required for an item to appear in a 'top-rated' chart (currently 10).
AV = the site mean average rating.
Showing latest 5 ratings for this track. | Show all 37 ratings for this track.
| Rating | Date updated | Member | Track ratings | Avg. track rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 11/28/2025 02:42 | Exist-en-ciel | 96,763 | 71/100 | |
| 10/23/2025 21:36 |  DommeDamian | 73,382 | 51/100 | |
| 08/30/2025 20:55 |  ExTeaSea | 12,714 | 85/100 | |
| 04/10/2025 21:22 | Pepeov | 6,396 | 78/100 | |
| 11/28/2023 16:59 | iasoninho | 1,342 | 89/100 |
Rating metrics:
Outliers can be removed when calculating a mean average to dampen the effects of ratings outside the normal distribution. This figure is provided as the trimmed mean. A high standard deviation can be legitimate, but can sometimes indicate 'gaming' is occurring. Consider a simplified example* of an item receiving ratings of 100, 50, & 0. The mean average rating would be 50. However, ratings of 55, 50 & 45 could also result in the same average. The second average might be more trusted because there is more consensus around a particular rating (a lower deviation).
(*In practice, some tracks can have several thousand ratings)
This track is rated in the top 5% of all tracks on BestEverAlbums.com. This track has a Bayesian average rating of 80.6/100, a mean average of 80.7/100, and a trimmed mean (excluding outliers) of 81.8/100. The standard deviation for this track is 12.7.
Ziggomatic 17 comments
Be the first to add a comment for this track - add your comment!
Your feedback for Ziggomatic 17
A lot of hard work happens in the background to keep BEA running, and it's especially difficult to do this when we can't pay our hosting fees :(
We work very hard to ensure our site is as fast (and FREE!) as possible, and we respect your privacy.
