No. 99 (track)
by Joey Bada$$
No. 99 appears on the following album(s) by Joey Bada$$:
- B4.Da.$$ (track #9) (this album) (2015)
Upcoming concerts
Listen to No. 99 on YouTube
No. 99 ratings
Average Rating = (n ÷ (n + m)) × av + (m ÷ (n + m)) × AVwhere:
av = trimmed mean average rating an item has currently received.
n = number of ratings an item has currently received.
m = minimum number of ratings required for an item to appear in a 'top-rated' chart (currently 10).
AV = the site mean average rating.
Showing latest 5 ratings for this track. | Show all 18 ratings for this track.
| Rating | Date updated | Member | Track ratings | Avg. track rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 09/12/2025 11:13 |  DommeDamian | 73,264 | 51/100 | |
| 07/19/2022 08:39 |  srogers900 | 12,107 | 88/100 | |
| 08/20/2020 14:00 | snooppigg | 10,316 | 77/100 | |
| 07/17/2020 01:50 |  LebowskiRams | 12,106 | 82/100 | |
| 07/06/2019 23:04 |  fume0dm | 4,397 | 84/100 |
Rating metrics:
Outliers can be removed when calculating a mean average to dampen the effects of ratings outside the normal distribution. This figure is provided as the trimmed mean. A high standard deviation can be legitimate, but can sometimes indicate 'gaming' is occurring. Consider a simplified example* of an item receiving ratings of 100, 50, & 0. The mean average rating would be 50. However, ratings of 55, 50 & 45 could also result in the same average. The second average might be more trusted because there is more consensus around a particular rating (a lower deviation).
(*In practice, some tracks can have several thousand ratings)
This track is rated in the top 10% of all tracks on BestEverAlbums.com. This track has a Bayesian average rating of 78.8/100, a mean average of 80.3/100, and a trimmed mean (excluding outliers) of 80.3/100. The standard deviation for this track is 8.1.
No. 99 comments
Be the first to add a comment for this track - add your comment!
Your feedback for No. 99
A lot of hard work happens in the background to keep BEA running, and it's especially difficult to do this when we can't pay our hosting fees :(
We work very hard to ensure our site is as fast (and FREE!) as possible, and we respect your privacy.
