(I Can't Get No) Satisfaction (track) by The Rolling Stones
Year: 1965
From the album Out Of Our Heads (track #7)
(I Can't Get No) Satisfaction appears on the following album(s) by The Rolling Stones:
- Out Of Our Heads (track #7) (this album) (1965)
- Forty Licks (track #3) (compilation) (2002)
- Hot Rocks 1964–1971 (track #4) (compilation) (1971)
- Rolled Gold+: The Very Best Of The Rolling Stones (track #12) (compilation) (2007)
- Flashpoint (track #15) (1991)
- Shine A Light (track #20) (2008)
- Singles Collection: The London Years (track #19) (compilation) (1989)
- Live Licks (track #11) (2004)
- Got Live If You Want It! (track #12) (1966)
- Still Life (American Concert 1981) (track #11) (1982)
Upcoming concerts
Listen to (I Can't Get No) Satisfaction on YouTube
(I Can't Get No) Satisfaction ratings
where:
av = trimmed mean average rating an item has currently received.
n = number of ratings an item has currently received.
m = minimum number of ratings required for an item to appear in a 'top-rated' chart (currently 10).
AV = the site mean average rating.
Showing latest 5 ratings for this track. | Show all 470 ratings for this track.
Rating | Date updated | Member | Track ratings | Avg. track rating |
---|---|---|---|---|
3 days ago | DommeDamian | 57,285 | 52/100 | |
03/11/2024 15:05 | goeie-oko | 646 | 87/100 | |
02/17/2024 19:10 | RockingRoll666 | 1,017 | 80/100 | |
02/01/2024 14:50 | elchoppe | 539 | 89/100 | |
12/27/2023 21:05 | jonatascv1990 | 328 | 91/100 |
Rating metrics:
Outliers can be removed when calculating a mean average to dampen the effects of ratings outside the normal distribution. This figure is provided as the trimmed mean. A high standard deviation can be legitimate, but can sometimes indicate 'gaming' is occurring. Consider a simplified example* of an item receiving ratings of 100, 50, & 0. The mean average rating would be 50. However, ratings of 55, 50 & 45 could also result in the same average. The second average might be more trusted because there is more consensus around a particular rating (a lower deviation).
(*In practice, some tracks can have several thousand ratings)
This track is rated in the top 1% of all tracks on BestEverAlbums.com. This track has a Bayesian average rating of 89.7/100, a mean average of 89.2/100, and a trimmed mean (excluding outliers) of 90.0/100. The standard deviation for this track is 12.3.
Please log in or register if you want to be able to leave a rating
(I Can't Get No) Satisfaction favourites
Showing latest 20 members who have added this track as a favourite | Show all 53 members
(I Can't Get No) Satisfaction comments
Showing all 7 comments |
Most Helpful First | Newest First | Maximum Rated First |
Longest Comments First
(Only showing comments with -2 votes or higher. You can alter this threshold from your profile page. Manage Profile)
The eighth most iconic song ever (according to research, see my chart of most iconic songs https://www.besteveralbums.com/thechart.php?c=62924).
Hands down one of the best riffs ever. Don't @ me.
I think the riff is overrated but I love the song as a whole
The Rolling Stones first truly great single and of course one of the best and most enduring. Unlike the Beatles at this time the Stones were including social commentary in their songs and there's no better example of this than on this glorious track. Otis Redding recorded a fine cover of this song the same year as this release but that version doesn't quite have the snarl and swagger and even the raw sexuality of Jagger's brilliant vocal performance. Satisfaction, is a great track. Edgy and iconic.
Charlie Watts is a jazz drummer, and everything follows Keith, not the drums. This is a grweat, great, great song!
Good song but WTF with the drumming!
Great guitar sounds for the time. Thank goodness for the producer, because I heard Keith actually wanted that part to be done by horns.
Please log in or register if you want to be able to add a comment
Your feedback for (I Can't Get No) Satisfaction
A lot of hard work happens in the background to keep BEA running, and it's especially difficult to do this when we can't pay our hosting fees :(
We work very hard to ensure our site is as fast (and FREE!) as possible, and we respect your privacy.