Rolling Stone Chart

Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3
View previous topic :: View next topic
Author Message
Guest
  • #21
  • Posted: 06/03/2012 01:46
  • Post subject:
  • Reply with quote
Eggman/Walrus/Taxman wrote:
Whaddaya mean? Yeah it's boring. They had the decency to rank Abbey Road lower than The Beatles, but what about Sgt. Pepper and Rubber Soul?


I actually read an article the other day that said most people don't even consider the White Album the best Beatles album. It probably wasn't accurate.

lolcwutididthar?
Back to top
revolver94
professional dilettante


Gender: Male
Age: 29
Location: DC suburb
United States

  • #22
  • Posted: 06/03/2012 05:01
  • Post subject:
  • Reply with quote
Hayden wrote:
Cool Very Happy


sweet, the pitchfork decades lists are so great to look at. Sometimes they're too "hip" for their own good... like rating ziggy stardust #80 something of the 70's (worse than Aladdin sane... wut)
Back to top
  • Visit poster's website
  • View user's profile
  • Send private message
  • Visit poster's website
Facetious



Gender: Male
Age: 24
Location: Somewhere you've never been
Pakistan

  • #23
  • Posted: 06/03/2012 05:15
  • Post subject:
  • Reply with quote
swedenman wrote:
I actually read an article the other day that said most people don't even consider the White Album the best Beatles album. It probably wasn't accurate.

lolcwutididthar?


It was accurate. I've only met a few people on the Internet who thought that. One of them even used to think he was the only one Laughing
Back to top
  • Visit poster's website
  • View user's profile
  • Send private message
  • Visit poster's website
Facetious



Gender: Male
Age: 24
Location: Somewhere you've never been
Pakistan

  • #24
  • Posted: 06/03/2012 05:17
  • Post subject:
  • Reply with quote
revolver94 wrote:
sweet, the pitchfork decades lists are so great to look at. Sometimes they're too "hip" for their own good... like rating ziggy stardust #80 something of the 70's (worse than Aladdin sane... wut)


#80 something of the 70's.....hey, I actually agree with that, though Aladdin Sane should be #90 something, not higher than Ziggy.

Heroes and Low should be in the top 50.
Back to top
  • Visit poster's website
  • View user's profile
  • Send private message
  • Visit poster's website
Guest
  • #25
  • Posted: 06/03/2012 08:15
  • Post subject:
  • Reply with quote
Eggman/Walrus/Taxman wrote:
It was accurate. I've only met a few people on the Internet who thought that. One of them even used to think he was the only one Laughing


Yes, I'm perfectly aware. That's 'cuz you guys are silly.
Back to top
Facetious



Gender: Male
Age: 24
Location: Somewhere you've never been
Pakistan

  • #26
  • Posted: 06/03/2012 08:59
  • Post subject:
  • Reply with quote
swedenman wrote:
Yes, I'm perfectly aware. That's 'cuz you guys are silly.


You're the silly one Razz
Back to top
  • Visit poster's website
  • View user's profile
  • Send private message
  • Visit poster's website
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   This topic is locked: you cannot edit posts or make replies.
All times are GMT
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3
Page 3 of 3


 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Similar Topics
Topic Author Forum
Sticky: Definition of a 'Recognised Chart' albummaster Suggestions
Possible double chart entry for Rolli... hwex9000 Suggestions
[ Poll ] Rolling Stone Best Albums Of The 80's Hayden Music
Rolling Stone 500 is the older version ChromeAce Suggestions
Rolling Stone's Updated Top 100 Guita... 40footwolf Music

 

Powered by phpBB©
Back to Top
✖