what is wrong with bea #2

Goto page Previous  1, 2
View previous topic :: View next topic
Author Message
Defago
Your Most Favorite User


Gender: Male
Age: 31
Location: Lima
Peru

  • #11
  • Posted: 01/03/2013 02:58
  • Post subject:
  • Reply with quote
What's going on here
I'm having trouble trying
to read your Haikus.
Back to top
  • Visit poster's website
  • View user's profile
  • Send private message
martintho
martintho



Norway

  • #12
  • Posted: 01/03/2013 03:37
  • Post subject:
  • Reply with quote
Defago wrote:
What's going on here
I'm having trouble trying
to read your Haikus.


i'm having trouble writing them
Back to top
  • Visit poster's website
  • View user's profile
  • Send private message
Happymeal





  • #13
  • Posted: 01/03/2013 04:28
  • Post subject:
  • Reply with quote
martintho wrote:
as I have with mine.
it's the rating, damn it, the rating..
but this is the best EVER albums
yearly this-year ratings are extremely popular.
we must not let it digest this wonderful site


I really have no idea what you are saying....
Back to top
martintho
martintho



Norway

  • #14
  • Posted: 01/03/2013 04:35
  • Post subject:
  • Reply with quote
Happymeal wrote:
I really have no idea what you are saying....


i'm sorry.
i can really see that.
the new 2012-year chart has caused some troubles on this site with regards to the rating numbers.
it's complex.
maybe if you read the whole thread.
maybe not.
Back to top
  • Visit poster's website
  • View user's profile
  • Send private message
albummaster
Janitor


Gender: Male
Location: Spain
Site Admin

  • #15
  • Posted: 01/03/2013 09:00
  • Post subject: Re: what is wrong with bea #2
  • Reply with quote
martintho wrote:
i had great fun and found much knowledge going below the top 100 of each year treasurehunting finding hidden treasures. know this possibility is taken away from me. turns out it was a bug now fixed which enabled me to find these treasures. now i must go elsewhere looking: into each private members list. but being a statistics freak it freaks me out when reading that an album is #486 in 2012 or indeed #4301, that I cannot find out what else is in that neighbourhood. in the bea earlier, in a similar named thread, that was one of the arguments in favour of RYM, that there you would easier find gems. evrybody can understand this logic for themselves, this randomness, it doesn't meen it should be hidden for the stupid masses pardon my sarcasm, and as 19loveless91 points out, this will become less random downwards spiralling as bea grows AND you MAY have this randomness higher up the charts, eg between number 3 and four, the said situation that thebeatlesrevolver and pinkfloydswishyouwerehere was only divided by a point these two albums should be temporarily erased/made invisible?

I've no problem making the charts a bit longer, and they are only truncated because they don't make a lot of sense beyond a certain point. There will always be randomness at the tail end regardless of how big the site is, because of the way the rankings are set up (albums appearing in one chart will always be at the bottom).
Back to top
  • Visit poster's website
  • View user's profile
  • Send private message
albummaster
Janitor


Gender: Male
Location: Spain
Site Admin

  • #16
  • Posted: 01/03/2013 10:11
  • Post subject: Re: what is wrong with bea #2
  • Reply with quote
martintho wrote:
was my experience not quite the opposite, but?
that the site flooded with 2012 charts in the overall uniform.
new members did not have access to 2012 charts and posted 2012 charts in overall uniform, many of whom in spite?
to create the opposite effect from the one envisioned by 19loveless91, that the albums from 2012 actually have a much higher rating compered with their sisters from previous years?

or maybe it by chance evens out.

it's still a mess, though.

if you look at the rank points for albums in 2012, they are much lower than for 2011 (not higher). Any member can still put a 2012 album in their overall chart if they want to, this is not something restricted to new members. I don't think the 2012 charts looks a total mess, the top 10 shares many albums in common with other sites. I can't think of any two 2012 charts outside of BEA that share the same sequence as each other.
Back to top
  • Visit poster's website
  • View user's profile
  • Send private message
albummaster
Janitor


Gender: Male
Location: Spain
Site Admin

  • #17
  • Posted: 01/03/2013 10:13
  • Post subject:
  • Reply with quote
martintho wrote:
as I have with mine.
it's the rating, damn it, the rating..
but this is the best EVER albums
yearly this-year ratings are extremely popular.
we must not let it digest this wonderful site

I don't understand this point. Are you talking about the top-rated chart here?
Back to top
  • Visit poster's website
  • View user's profile
  • Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   This topic is locked: you cannot edit posts or make replies.
All times are GMT
Goto page Previous  1, 2
Page 2 of 2


 

Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Similar Topics
Topic Author Forum
I might be Wrong but... Behrus58 Music
What is wrong with BEA? Johnny Lounge
WTF Is Wrong With iTunes? Romanelli Music
Boy What The Hell's Wrong With You?? Anti Music Diaries
[ Poll ] Where did it all go wrong for music? Guest Music

 
Back to Top