|
View previous topic :: View next topic
|
|
| Author |
Message |
Guest
|
- #41
- Posted: 10/09/2013 19:18
- Post subject:
|
And to come back on topic...
I think every album I have ever listened to.. I have listened to in one sitting all the way through 
I do listen to songs on their own and love nothing more than spinning the singles when I'm home alone.
But an album should be honoured from beginning to end - no track skipping or nothing. Doesn't matter where I am or what I'm doing - that tends to be my approach!
|
|
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
|
sp4cetiger
|
- #42
- Posted: 10/09/2013 19:30
- Post subject:
|
| Mancsoulsister wrote: |
If you are listening to the album out of order (or randomly) then you are in fact not listening to that album at all. You are listening to something else entirely. |
Yeah, I think that hits the nail on the head. Prior to the mid-60s, it was pretty standard for the record company to mix and switch up the order of tracks on albums to appeal to particular demographics. For example, the American release of Rubber Soul was mixed up to achieve a more folky sound to exploit the American folk revival. They stopped that practice with Revolver (for the Beatles, anyway) and now I think it's generally understood that the artist puts songs in a particular order for a reason. The rise of the concept album in the late 60s probably had a lot to do with it.
Anyway, that may be a big reason why there are very few high-rated albums prior to the mid-60s. Back then, albums were mostly just collections of songs.
|
|
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
Guest
|
- #43
- Posted: 10/09/2013 19:34
- Post subject:
|
| Listmeister wrote: | | I wasn't offended; on the contrary, my response was like, "I guess I'm a typical American. No shame in that." So, sorry I put you on the spot like that, Leeth. |
I was responding to sp4cetiger by that point.
But yes, topic topic topic topic. Basically, everybody that isn't Listmeister is right.
|
|
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
Listmeister
Gender: Male
Location: Ohio
|
- #44
- Posted: 10/09/2013 19:43
- Post subject:
|
| lethalnezzle wrote: | | Basically, everybody that isn't Listmeister is right. |
LOL. Lethalnezzle, you're all right.
|
|
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
benpaco
Who's gonna watch you die?
Age: 27
Location: California
|
- #45
- Posted: 10/10/2013 02:25
- Post subject:
|
I mean, most good albums are better like that. The ones that stand out, though:
Skylarking by XTC. This one is one I'd say is required.
For Emma Forever Ago by Bon Iver. It loses something separated.
Foiled by Blue October. There's a very interesting roller coaster you get to ride with the full album that makes it 500000x better.
_________________
. . . 2016 . . . 2015 . . .
Things I Make
|
|
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
|
meruizh
Gender: Male
Age: 32
|
- #46
- Posted: 10/10/2013 03:46
- Post subject:
|
stupid thread....
post this on the official charts website
_________________
"Hurry Up, We're Dreaming"
|
|
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
AgainstMeAgainstYou
Gender: Male
Age: 28
Location: Ajax, ON
|
- #47
- Posted: 10/10/2013 14:33
- Post subject:
|
| benpaco wrote: | I mean, most good albums are better like that. The ones that stand out, though:
Skylarking by XTC. This one is one I'd say is required.
For Emma Forever Ago by Bon Iver. It loses something separated.
Foiled by Blue October. There's a very interesting roller coaster you get to ride with the full album that makes it 500000x better. |
This. So much. Same can be said for the self-titled album as well.
|
|
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
tgarritsen
Gender: Male
Age: 28
|
- #48
- Posted: 10/14/2013 23:39
- Post subject:
|
|
Too many to write down now.
|
|
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
