|
View previous topic :: View next topic
|
|
Author |
Message |
RoundTheBend
I miss the comfort in being sad
Location: Ground Control
|
- #31
- Posted: 03/23/2019 01:08
- Post subject:
|
Well I guess sold is a strong word.
What glitches if I may ask?
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
baystateoftheart
Neil Young as a butternut squash
Age: 29
Location: Massachusetts
|
- #32
- Posted: 03/23/2019 02:57
- Post subject:
|
sethmadsen wrote: | Well I guess sold is a strong word.
What glitches if I may ask? |
Albums I've downloaded getting split apart with the songs suddenly assigned to different releases like singles, comps, etc. Has been happening to a few albums every month and then I have to put them back together. _________________ Add me on RYM
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
RoundTheBend
I miss the comfort in being sad
Location: Ground Control
|
- #33
- Posted: 03/23/2019 13:32
- Post subject:
|
baystateoftheart wrote: | sethmadsen wrote: | Well I guess sold is a strong word.
What glitches if I may ask? |
Albums I've downloaded getting split apart with the songs suddenly assigned to different releases like singles, comps, etc. Has been happening to a few albums every month and then I have to put them back together. |
That is my biggest headache/why I stopped using my iTunes library... the "management" of it was already taken care of it for me when I use Spotify.
I do feel like it sounds way better than Spotify though. Less dynamic albums I can't really tell the difference, but others I'm wowed by the sound improvement.
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
RoundTheBend
I miss the comfort in being sad
Location: Ground Control
|
- #34
- Posted: 03/28/2019 03:18
- Post subject:
|
Small beef I do have is that I think the Top Albums stat only works for traditional albums. In theory the math works like this - average album is 10 songs or whatever, but let's say you listen to longer works - that makes it so a 10 song album has less of a chance... you gotta listen to that 7 times before 69 love songs matches as a single listen.
Anyway, a bit of a completionist, but would prefer the full album listened to as a single count instead of basically how many tracks are on an album, and if it is longer, that's your "top album"... lazy math say I... the dude complaining about a site that apparently is now defunct.
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
craola
crayon master
Location: pdx
|
- #35
- Posted: 03/28/2019 05:48
- Post subject:
|
sethmadsen wrote: | Small beef I do have is that I think the Top Albums stat only works for traditional albums. In theory the math works like this - average album is 10 songs or whatever, but let's say you listen to longer works - that makes it so a 10 song album has less of a chance... you gotta listen to that 7 times before 69 love songs matches as a single listen.
Anyway, a bit of a completionist, but would prefer the full album listened to as a single count instead of basically how many tracks are on an album, and if it is longer, that's your "top album"... lazy math say I... the dude complaining about a site that apparently is now defunct. |
yeah, i agree with that. i think the better solution would be to count an entire album listen (basically go by the lowest play count on the record) rather than by each track. but then a lot of people don't listen to albums, so the site caters to that.... _________________ follow me on the bandcamp.
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
|
|
All times are GMT
|
Page 4 of 4 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|
|
|