I just did some on another AI music site called "Suno". Here's one I did about what is probably my favorite moment in the history of sports, Jesse Owens in the 1936 Olympics. I just wish I could change the cover image. Apparently, you can't do that on Suno. The AI gave me an image of a cycler instead of a track athlete.
This is a new song from Randy Travis, but the Artificial Intelligence ability is what's being used to keep his voice out there since it may be the only option that there is with his health being the way that it still is.
P.S. How do I feel about it? It's sad that he can't deliver like he used to, but if he had not delivered when it was still an option for him, he would never once be the subject of anyone's musical conversation. In other words, if anyone has earned the right to go such a route, it is most definitely him. Go here for a list of all the love he received from the awards show powers that be. Happy 65th birthday to him by the way. _________________ Me & my favorite singer James Otto
Check him out here when you can!
There is an Instagram page called TheAIBeatles. What they are doing is taking their own songs (which are mostly terrible) and using AI to insert voices that supposedly sound like The Beatles. They include pictures of them as well.
It's really awful, and to me, it's pretty disrespectful. They are using AI to manipulate their own music and selling it to people as "this is what our shitty songs would sound like if The Beatles recorded them".
I want to hear the artist in their own voice and in their own words. I have zero interest in hearing computer generated recreations or imagined music. I want the actual human creative part of it to be what the song is...I don't care what a computer thinks I want to hear. And even if you can't sing or play...I'd still rather hear you than AI.
My opinion. If you like it, good for you. _________________ May we all get to heaven
'Fore the devil knows we're dead...
There is an Instagram page called TheAIBeatles. What they are doing is taking their own songs (which are mostly terrible) and using AI to insert voices that supposedly sound like The Beatles. They include pictures of them as well.
It's really awful, and to me, it's pretty disrespectful. They are using AI to manipulate their own music and selling it to people as "this is what our shitty songs would sound like if The Beatles recorded them".
I want to hear the artist in their own voice and in their own words. I have zero interest in hearing computer generated recreations or imagined music. I want the actual human creative part of it to be what the song is...I don't care what a computer thinks I want to hear. And even if you can't sing or play...I'd still rather hear you than AI.
My opinion. If you like it, good for you.
all of the AI stuff to date — be it chatgpt, midjourney, gemini, etc. — leave me with this uncanny valley sort of feeling. only, it doesn’t creep me out so much as chase my interest away.
if it ever gets to the point where my brain can’t tell the difference, i don’t know how i’ll react. _________________ follow me on the bandcamp.
@Romanelli wrote: "There is an Instagram page called TheAIBeatles. What they are doing is taking their own songs (which are mostly terrible) and using AI to insert voices that supposedly sound like The Beatles. They include pictures of them as well.
It's really awful, and to me, it's pretty disrespectful. They are using AI to manipulate their own music and selling it to people as "this is what our shitty songs would sound like if The Beatles recorded them"."
I am not a Beatles fan. I don't think they sing good at all, with or without AI.
Do you think that one day they will ever make an AI powerful enough to make the Beatles sing good or is that just outside the capabilities of any human or machine _________________ 2023 music critic simulator
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
