View previous topic :: View next topic
|
|
Author |
Message |
Guest
|
- #11
- Posted: 06/05/2012 22:41
- Post subject:
|
pearljammer13 wrote: | Dookie by Green Day is basically an entire album about the trials and tribulations of a small town teen. Impossible to do it any better in my opinion. |
Simply, anything by Green Day, or perhaps Arctic Monkeys or The Flaming Lips!
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
Guest
|
- #12
- Posted: 06/05/2012 23:04
- Post subject:
|
tekin wrote: | Simply, anything by Green Day, or perhaps Arctic Monkeys or The Flaming Lips! |
I feel like a lot of 13-year-olds would listen to The Flaming Lips and just think wtf. Green Day and Arctic Monkeys would work great, though.
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
GeevyDallas
WATTBA
|
- #13
- Posted: 06/05/2012 23:16
- Post subject:
|
I think the two for me when I was 13 was WPSIATWIN by The Arctic Monkeys(they were huge in Ireland and the UK when I was 13,hard to avoid) and Dookie,although the former is one I'd give to someone in their mid teens 15-16 as alot of the songs would be more age appropriate and it's when I first began to truly appreciate it.Dookie however,Dookie is the perfect album for a 13 year old male,that or XXX by Danny Brown.
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
HigherThanTheSun
Gender: Male
Age: 33
Location: UK
|
- #14
- Posted: 06/06/2012 00:43
- Post subject:
|
I think a 13 year old wouldn't be able to get into The Flaming Lips at all, let alone anything like Kid A.
Would have to be Nevermind, that's the first album I properly loved. _________________ Shut up mate you're boring!
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
Facetious
Gender: Male
Age: 24
Location: Somewhere you've never been
|
- #15
- Posted: 06/06/2012 02:14
- Post subject:
|
swedenman wrote: | Because it's quiet and slow-paced. I don't know what kind of attention spans the 13-year-olds in your life have, but the ones in mine most likely couldn't even get halfway through Funeral. |
I'm 12, and I think that despite being slow-paced, Arcade Fire's music is pretty exciting. And literally the definition of awesome.
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
Jackwc
Queen Of The Forums
Location: Aaaanywhere Sex: Incredible
|
- #16
- Posted: 06/06/2012 02:29
- Post subject:
|
swedenman wrote: | Because it's quiet and slow-paced. I don't know what kind of attention spans the 13-year-olds in your life have, but the ones in mine most likely couldn't even get halfway through Funeral. |
Funeral was one of my favourite albums when it came out. I was at least 12. Hayden dug it when he was 9.
My brother digs it, he's 6.
I think you need to give kids a little more credit. _________________ A dick that's bigger than the sun.
Music sucks. Check out my favourite movies, fam:
http://letterboxd.com/jackiegigantic/
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
Polythene Pam
|
- #17
- Posted: 06/06/2012 02:43
- Post subject:
|
Jackwc wrote: |
I think you need to give kids a little more credit. |
Yeah they shouldn't have to listen to Funeral
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
Facetious
Gender: Male
Age: 24
Location: Somewhere you've never been
|
- #18
- Posted: 06/06/2012 02:51
- Post subject:
|
Polythene Pam wrote: | Yeah they shouldn't have to listen to Funeral |
Or music, for that matter.
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
Guest
|
- #19
- Posted: 06/06/2012 03:54
- Post subject:
|
Jackwc wrote: | Funeral was one of my favourite albums when it came out. I was at least 12. Hayden dug it when he was 9.
My brother digs it, he's 6.
I think you need to give kids a little more credit. |
Of course there are exceptions. But can you honestly tell me that, of all the 13-year-olds you've known in your life, most or even very many of them would like Arcade Fire?
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
Necharsian
Best Ever User
Gender: Male
|
- #20
- Posted: 06/06/2012 04:18
- Post subject:
|
Eggman/Walrus/Taxman wrote: | I'm 12, and I think that despite being slow-paced, Arcade Fire's music is pretty exciting. And literally the definition of awesome. |
That's because you arent living your childhood.
Seriously I would say Linkin Park, Blink 182, Billy Talent.
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
|