Your Rating Criteria

[JMan]

I meant the popularity of the ALBUM. I can see how I messed up, there.

OK, so popularity of SONGS will only occur if the song is an icon, but the entire albums will have nothing to do with popularity, so that I don't accidentally get two of the same score, like I id with Hysteria and Appetite for Destruction.

[Happymeal]

Well, not too sure about what happened in the last 16 pages, but I think I'd prefer to ignore it.

Currently, my theory is just give everything a 100, no matter what. Even if I despise the chart, I'll give it a 100 (currently at least). My logic goes like this, I feel glad when someone gives me a high rating because well it just shows that either people enjoy the same music or they enjoy my chart. When the rating goes up, it gets me fairly excited, so my thinking is why not give people the opportunity to feel the same way? of course, there are a few comments I've left in the past that I'd love to take back, but in the end, it's all good.

[Kiki]

Rate all charts 100. I'd be too harsh otherwise.

[junodog4]

This thread is worth it for the classic Jewsome/Naples debate.

I rate based on what I like.
_________________
Finnegan was super bad-ass.

[JMan]

For a long time I've been guessing what EXACTLY my main chart was based on, and I thought it was a bounch of different stuff. Now I know EXACTLY what my chart is based on

How well each instrument is done, Production value, Flow of the album, and how the album makes me move inside.

My other Favorites chart is based solely on movement inside and out. This means The album makes me feel something inside, and rock out loud on the outside.

As for my RATING, I've seen the same albums on charts over and over again, and I personally like to see something different. I hardly ever rate a chart less than 3 stars because I respect their opinions, but I always like something different.

[Puncture Repair]

[Guest]

[JMan]

[Defago]

[Puncture Repair]