The Rolling Stones or The Who

Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next
View previous topic :: View next topic
Author Message
Elston




Canada

  • #21
  • Posted: 10/02/2009 12:51
  • Post subject:
  • Reply with quote
Haha! Suck on that one jocks. Yeah jocks, more like fucks, yeah, more like fucks.
Back to top
  • Visit poster's website
  • View user's profile
  • Send private message
badfaith



Gender: Male
Age: 48
Location: Kent
United Kingdom

  • #22
  • Posted: 10/02/2009 13:40
  • Post subject:
  • Reply with quote
The Who for me.

I think The Rolling Stones longevity has been detrimental to how I see them. Although I love Let it bleed (by virtue of the fact that it doesn't have their most hackneyed songs), the fact they've been peddling these songs for god knows how long over and over in every corner of the cube takes away from their songs' specialness... they captured a moment in time... now a become a stick with which to beat you.

I know the Who have also been going for a bit (until recently of course), but they haven't been so highly visible, and invading my consciousness everytime they launch a new overblown rehashed attempt to relive passed glories mega global dominance even if you get a ticket you'll be so far away from the stage you may as well be at home watching on television travelling museum.
Back to top
  • Visit poster's website
  • View user's profile
  • Send private message
ffudnebbuh
level 8


Gender: Male
Location: Boston
United States

  • #23
  • Posted: 10/04/2009 14:57
  • Post subject:
  • Reply with quote
forgot to answer the question, for me, it is the Stones, "Paint it Black' is my fav.. have to listen to a mint copy of the 45 to get real mono sonic crunch.
Back to top
  • Visit poster's website
  • View user's profile
  • Send private message
Facetious



Gender: Male
Age: 24
Location: Somewhere you've never been
Pakistan

  • #24
  • Posted: 03/16/2012 10:07
  • Post subject:
  • Reply with quote
The Rolling Stones.
Back to top
  • Visit poster's website
  • View user's profile
  • Send private message
  • Visit poster's website
Error Finn



Gender: Male
Age: 54
Location: Finland
Finland

  • #25
  • Posted: 03/16/2012 16:01
  • Post subject:
  • Reply with quote
The Who - I think, they are more "original". RS has never been a band that leads the way. Compare to other: The Beatles, The Cream, The Animals, The Kinks, The Pretty Things and The Pink Floyd.
_________________
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MNGpsnTCUXM
Back to top
  • Visit poster's website
  • View user's profile
  • Send private message
BlueNote





  • #26
  • Posted: 03/16/2012 19:29
  • Post subject:
  • Reply with quote
Good question, but I'll take the Stones.
Back to top
  • Visit poster's website
  • View user's profile
  • Send private message
Hermes_requite



Gender: Male
Location: Goodlettsville TN
United States

  • #27
  • Posted: 03/19/2012 06:13
  • Post subject:
  • Reply with quote
It's very hard to chose between two of my favorite bands. But I must go with The Who. Keith Moon and John Entwistle were the best rhythm section of any band that ever took the stage. And The Who just seemed to have more fun being together in a band.


Link
Back to top
  • Visit poster's website
  • View user's profile
  • Send private message
RoundTheBend
I miss the comfort in being sad



Location: Ground Control
United States

  • #28
  • Posted: 03/19/2012 07:39
  • Post subject:
  • Reply with quote
Personally I like the Stones more. I would like to claim that they were more influential, but I feel like The Beatles made the Stones not as relevant. The Who seems to have hit their high period more in the 70s, escaping the Beatles.

Plus they were some of the first to smash their instruments, which has since become part of Rock and Roll, from Nirvana to Muse.
Back to top
  • Visit poster's website
  • View user's profile
  • Send private message
jhuik
BOSS


Gender: Male
Age: 59
Location: K-Dubz, just west of the 6ix, ON
Canada

  • #29
  • Posted: 03/21/2012 15:50
  • Post subject:
  • Reply with quote
The Who. They took rock seriously and believed it might make the world a better place. The Stones are mainly a get drunk and party band. So if that's your thing....
_________________
Top Canadian songs, keyless entry remotes, home care, whatever...
Back to top
  • Visit poster's website
  • View user's profile
  • Send private message
  • Visit poster's website
Mother Nature's Son



Gender: Male
Age: 31
Denmark

  • #30
  • Posted: 03/21/2012 17:29
  • Post subject:
  • Reply with quote
Nothing happens in 2½ year, and then suddenly the thread becomes relevant again.. But hey! This thread IS still relevant..

What my choice would be? Arhh, still need to listen to too many albums with the Who to make MY comment relevant. I'll come back some other day!
Back to top
  • Visit poster's website
  • View user's profile
  • Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   This topic is locked: you cannot edit posts or make replies.
All times are GMT
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next
Page 3 of 4


 

Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Similar Topics
Topic Author Forum
[ Poll ] The Rolling Stones or U2? RoundTheBend Music
Beatles vs. the Rolling Stones ffudnebbuh Music
My top 50 Rolling Stones songs. garycottier Music
What are the Top 10 Rolling Stones so... bobbyb5 Music
[ Poll ] Which Rolling Stones Era is your favo... RoundTheBend Music

 
Back to Top