Rock & Roll R.I.P?

Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next
View previous topic :: View next topic
Author Message
badfaith



Gender: Male
Age: 48
Location: Kent
United Kingdom

  • #11
  • Posted: 12/28/2009 12:26
  • Post subject:
  • Reply with quote
purple wrote:
If only the internet was as widespread in the 70s: "is jazz dead?"

Obviously great jazz has survived, it's just not as popular and widespread as it was in the middle of last century. Obviously great rock 'n roll will continue, but we'll probably be seeing more and more electronic music, until something else becomes more popular (probably "post-music," and then everyone will realize how great MMM is...)


Maybe then it's a question of cultural digestion. Jazz erupted in popular consciousness, was mentally masticated, then, all the nutrients absorbed from it, before settling in the bowels of modern life, having found it's proper place... and now Rock & Roll ( and then Rock) has at last been digested thoroughly.

Now we seek sustainence elsewhere.
Back to top
  • Visit poster's website
  • View user's profile
  • Send private message
Alt-Rocker77




Location: NJ

  • #12
  • Posted: 12/28/2009 17:55
  • Post subject:
  • Reply with quote
I think a better question is not "Is Rock dead?', but "Is there anything new to create in the genre?" Let's examine this decade, It starts off exceedingly well with Kid A, which infused krautrock, britpop, shoegaze, and electronica into one convincingly amazing sound. The very next year the band receiving the attention was the Strokes, who were not a band band by any means, but weren't exactly trailblazers. The rest of the decade seemed to be bent around This Is It?, in the sense that the styles of the 60's weren't being adapted, so much as copied. For the most part, this music wasn't bad, some of it great (The White Stripes will go down as one of the best rock bands ever), but it made me begin to question whether or not rock had any new ideas left. The electronic and hip hop genres had far more game changers than rock. I think the next 5 years will be indicative of where things are going.
Back to top
  • Visit poster's website
  • View user's profile
  • Send private message
Alt-Rocker77




Location: NJ

  • #13
  • Posted: 12/28/2009 17:55
  • Post subject:
  • Reply with quote
I think a better question is not "Is Rock dead?', but "Is there anything new to create in the genre?" Let's examine this decade, It starts off exceedingly well with Kid A, which infused krautrock, britpop, shoegaze, and electronica into one convincingly amazing sound. The very next year the band receiving the attention was the Strokes, who were not a band band by any means, but weren't exactly trailblazers. The rest of the decade seemed to be bent around This Is It?, in the sense that the styles of the 60's weren't being adapted, so much as copied. For the most part, this music wasn't bad, some of it great (The White Stripes will go down as one of the best rock bands ever), but it made me begin to question whether or not rock had any new ideas left. The electronic and hip hop genres had far more game changers than rock. I think the next 5 years will be indicative of where things are going.
Back to top
  • Visit poster's website
  • View user's profile
  • Send private message
Freddie55



Gender: Male
Location: Toronto, ON
Canada

  • #14
  • Posted: 12/28/2009 18:30
  • Post subject:
  • Reply with quote
My observation is that, whether we like it or loathe it, the most popular rock bands today are: The Killers, Kings of Leon, Coldplay and Radiohead. And these top four are not as popular as U2 and many geriatric rockers doing their victory laps.
Back to top
  • Visit poster's website
  • View user's profile
  • Send private message
  • Visit poster's website
Kiki





  • #15
  • Posted: 12/28/2009 19:18
  • Post subject:
  • Reply with quote
So does anyone think that pursuit of fame and artistic merit can coexist as goals of a musician if they were to balance the two?
Back to top
RFNAPLES
Level 8


Gender: Male
Age: 75
Location: Durham, NC, USA
United States

  • #16
  • Posted: 12/28/2009 22:33
  • Post subject:
  • Reply with quote
an_outlaw wrote:
So does anyone think that pursuit of fame and artistic merit can coexist as goals of a musician if they were to balance the two?


Yes, I think they can coexist.
_________________
Top 100 Greatest Music Albums by RFNAPLES
Bubbling Under The Top 100 Greatest Mus...y RFNAPLES
Back to top
  • Visit poster's website
  • View user's profile
  • Send private message
  • Send email
  • Visit poster's website
Freddie55



Gender: Male
Location: Toronto, ON
Canada

  • #17
  • Posted: 12/28/2009 23:25
  • Post subject:
  • Reply with quote
an_outlaw wrote:
So does anyone think that pursuit of fame and artistic merit can coexist as goals of a musician if they were to balance the two?


Sure. Anyone (artist or not) can be driven by a desire to become famous and rich for being the best in his/her field. It doesn't require balance. It requires excellence and drive.
Back to top
  • Visit poster's website
  • View user's profile
  • Send private message
  • Visit poster's website
telefunker



Gender: Male
Age: 39
United Kingdom

  • #18
  • Posted: 12/28/2009 23:32
  • Post subject:
  • Reply with quote
it's very easy to satisfy your musical ambitions if you're not seeking fame and fortune.
_________________
no fat chicks
Back to top
  • Visit poster's website
  • View user's profile
  • Send private message
badfaith



Gender: Male
Age: 48
Location: Kent
United Kingdom

  • #19
  • Posted: 12/30/2009 13:41
  • Post subject:
  • Reply with quote
I think I see three distinct flavours of musician emerging here:

First, the musician who loves making music for it's own sake (excellence and musical ambition) (anonymous, or low key types like Pink Floyd, Session musicians etc)

Second, the ME musician... Personally ambitious, who seeks to promote him/herself before the music, and includes those who see music as a tool for making money. (ALL "R&B", modern Rap and "Hip Hop")

and Third, the ideallist... Those who we've come to believe were trying to make the grand gesture, to live the life, and in some cases stand for something bigger.
(Bob Dylan, Lennon, Morrison, Moon, etc.)

...And thus revealed, it's this third group my question was about really,- do they still exist?... Did they ever really exist?, or have we romantisised their exploits, deeds, and bestowed attributes on them they never really possessed?

...I wonder if it is this question, and personally my growing concern that this has shattered the myth, that has opened the door for the second group, not only through the demise of the third group, but also the expense of the first.
Back to top
  • Visit poster's website
  • View user's profile
  • Send private message
badfaith



Gender: Male
Age: 48
Location: Kent
United Kingdom

  • #20
  • Posted: 12/30/2009 13:49
  • Post subject:
  • Reply with quote
...Would make a good game- gather all the artists, and sort them into three pots- ART, CASH, or ICON... great fun for all the family, and a potential source of much debate and possible bloodshed!
Back to top
  • Visit poster's website
  • View user's profile
  • Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   This topic is locked: you cannot edit posts or make replies.
All times are GMT
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next
Page 2 of 4


 

Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Similar Topics
Topic Author Forum
New Rock N Roll Happymeal Music
I'm a little bit country, a little bi... bobbyb5 Music
Best rock and roll language bobbyb5 Music
A Rock and Roll Christmas bobbyb5 Music
[ Poll ] BEA's Rock and Roll Hall of Fame benpaco Games

 
Back to Top