How do you feel about CDs being re-released with new songs?

Goto page 1, 2, 3  Next
View previous topic :: View next topic
Author Message
JOSweetHeart



Gender: Female
Age: 41
Location: East Tennessee

  • #1
  • Posted: 10/13/2013 21:03
  • Post subject: How do you feel about CDs being re-released with new songs?
  • Reply with quote
I just read that country trio Lady Antebellum will be re-releasing their newest album named Golden next month with newer songs added to it. To me, this is a way to make the album as a whole sell more, but on the other hand, it can also make those who bought the album when it was released the first time feel like they should have waited because their copy will not have as many songs as the newer released copy does. What do y'all think?

God bless you and Lady A always!!! Smile Smile Smile

Holly
_________________
Me & my favorite singer James Otto

Check him out here when you can!
Back to top
  • Visit poster's website
  • View user's profile
  • Send private message
JMan





  • #2
  • Posted: 10/13/2013 21:12
  • Post subject:
  • Reply with quote
I like the idea overall. My re-release of bat Out of Hell has a live version of the title track which, although not comparable to the studio version, has it's own flare that rocks out loud. re-releases means more songs. There's never been a downside to me.
Back to top
Guest





  • #3
  • Posted: 10/13/2013 21:21
  • Post subject:
  • Reply with quote
I tend to ignore any and all re-release bonus tracks just because...if they were essential to the album they would have been included initially, lol.
Back to top
Cymro2011
The Beatles were objectively average


Gender: Male
Age: 28
Location: In a deep, dark bubblegum graveyard
United Kingdom

  • #4
  • Posted: 10/13/2013 21:23
  • Post subject:
  • Reply with quote
Usually I'd be against this but since I discovered the re release of Microminiature Love by Michael Yonkers Band my mind has been changed. The 6 tracks that were added pretty much count as the second half of the album in my mind.

Edit: actually, it depends. Sometimes it's done right and sometimes it isn't.


Last edited by Cymro2011 on 10/13/2013 21:57; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
  • Visit poster's website
  • View user's profile
  • Send private message
Romanelli
Bone Swah


Gender: Male
Location: Broomfield, Colorado
United States
Moderator

  • #5
  • Posted: 10/13/2013 21:38
  • Post subject:
  • Reply with quote
I hate bonus tracks for the most part. Those tracks didn't make the original cut for a reason, and I think people are foolish for falling for the whole "buy the album again because it has new tracks" ploy.

And that live "Bat Out Of Hell" track is one of the most painfully awful vocals ever recorded. Aday should have never allowed that to be heard by anyone. His voice was so torn up that he could barely finish the song. A perfect example of why bonus tracks suck.
_________________
May we all get to heaven
'Fore the devil knows we're dead...
Back to top
  • Visit poster's website
  • View user's profile
  • Send private message
  • Visit poster's website
Patman360
Serenity Now


Gender: Male
Age: 31
Location: Cork, Ireland
Ireland
Moderator

  • #6
  • Posted: 10/13/2013 21:57
  • Post subject:
  • Reply with quote
It really just depends on the album; I can completely ignore them if an album has been a struggle to get through (Doesn't happen that often though), but I can love these tracks on other albums. There have been numerous times where I've bought re-releases and not released the tracks at the end weren't part of the original tracklist, therefore being convinced for months that they were actually part of the album till I see it on BEA... Brick wall
_________________


2023
2022
Back to top
  • Visit poster's website
  • View user's profile
  • Send private message
Guest





  • #7
  • Posted: 10/13/2013 22:02
  • Post subject:
  • Reply with quote
As long as they're at the end I don't care. I just eject the CD from my stereo before they start playing. Now, on albums like The Stone Roses where they just plop them right in the middle of the album, THAT pisses me off.
Back to top
Cymro2011
The Beatles were objectively average


Gender: Male
Age: 28
Location: In a deep, dark bubblegum graveyard
United Kingdom

  • #8
  • Posted: 10/13/2013 22:05
  • Post subject:
  • Reply with quote
swedenman wrote:
As long as they're at the end I don't care. I just eject the CD from my stereo before they start playing. Now, on albums like The Stone Roses where they just plop them right in the middle of the album, THAT pisses me off.


They seriously did that? Now that's stupid.
Back to top
  • Visit poster's website
  • View user's profile
  • Send private message
Guest





  • #9
  • Posted: 10/13/2013 22:10
  • Post subject:
  • Reply with quote
Cymro2011 wrote:
They seriously did that? Now that's stupid.


Actually, I guess the one with "Elephant Stone" as the third track was just the US tracklist, not a re-release. Still, it annoys me.
Back to top
rayword45



Gender: Male
Age: 26
United States

  • #10
  • Posted: 10/13/2013 22:34
  • Post subject:
  • Reply with quote
Cymro2011 wrote:
They seriously did that? Now that's stupid.




Having never listened to the album with the original tracklist, I say it works pretty well here.
Back to top
  • Visit poster's website
  • View user's profile
  • Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   This topic is locked: you cannot edit posts or make replies.
All times are GMT
Goto page 1, 2, 3  Next
Page 1 of 3


 

Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Similar Topics
Topic Author Forum
GREAT songs not released on studio album RoundTheBend Music
[ Poll ] How do you feel about the silence bet... SingingPeasant96 Music
Songs that make you picture or feel s... undefined Music
I released an album eyal91 Music
MANNER (released) Hayden Music

 
Back to Top