D.N.A. (track)
by A Flock Of Seagulls
Year: 1982
From the album A Flock Of Seagulls (track #9)
Listen on Spotify
D.N.A. appears on the following album(s) by A Flock Of Seagulls:
- A Flock Of Seagulls (track #9) (this album) (1982)
- The Best Of A Flock Of Seagulls (track #10) (compilation) (1986)
Upcoming concerts






Listen to D.N.A. on YouTube
D.N.A. ratings
Average Rating = (n ÷ (n + m)) × av + (m ÷ (n + m)) × AVwhere:
av = trimmed mean average rating an item has currently received.
n = number of ratings an item has currently received.
m = minimum number of ratings required for an item to appear in a 'top-rated' chart (currently 10).
AV = the site mean average rating.
| Rating | Date updated | Member | Track ratings | Avg. track rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ! | 10/15/2025 06:12 | 26,805 | 73/100 | |
| ! | 10/10/2025 02:43 | 12,449 | 85/100 | |
| ! | 04/30/2025 17:30 | matterhornrider | 22,670 | 86/100 |
| ! | 04/29/2024 18:24 | markl73 | 6,225 | 79/100 |
| ! | 02/24/2023 14:45 | 1,812 | 64/100 |
Rating metrics:
Outliers can be removed when calculating a mean average to dampen the effects of ratings outside the normal distribution. This figure is provided as the trimmed mean. A high standard deviation can be legitimate, but can sometimes indicate 'gaming' is occurring. Consider a simplified example* of an item receiving ratings of 100, 50, & 0. The mean average rating would be 50. However, ratings of 55, 50 & 45 could also result in the same average. The second average might be more trusted because there is more consensus around a particular rating (a lower deviation).
(*In practice, some tracks can have several thousand ratings)
This track has a Bayesian average rating of 74.7/100, a mean average of 72.6/100, and a trimmed mean (excluding outliers) of 74.1/100. The standard deviation for this track is 10.5.
D.N.A. comments
Be the first to add a comment for this track - add your comment!
Your feedback for D.N.A.
A lot of hard work happens in the background to keep BEA running, and it's especially difficult to do this when we can't pay our hosting fees :(
We work very hard to ensure our site is as fast (and FREE!) as possible, and we respect your privacy.
