Guess Who's Back (track)
by 2Pac
Year: 1993
From the album Strictly 4 My N.I.G.G.A.Z... (track #9)
Listen on Spotify
Guess Who's Back appears on the following album(s) by 2Pac:
- Strictly 4 My N.I.G.G.A.Z... (track #9) (this album) (1993)
Upcoming concerts
Listen to Guess Who's Back on YouTube
Guess Who's Back ratings
Average Rating = (n ÷ (n + m)) × av + (m ÷ (n + m)) × AVwhere:
av = trimmed mean average rating an item has currently received.
n = number of ratings an item has currently received.
m = minimum number of ratings required for an item to appear in a 'top-rated' chart (currently 10).
AV = the site mean average rating.
| Rating | Date updated | Member | Track ratings | Avg. track rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ! | 02/05/2025 16:31 | daCritic | 34,118 | 76/100 |
| ! | 04/05/2024 22:34 | phmusic | 62,859 | 100/100 |
| ! | 08/16/2022 16:04 |  DommeDamian | 72,865 | 51/100 |
| ! | 09/28/2021 15:07 |  covecove | 66,825 | 84/100 |
| ! | 09/11/2020 11:46 |  Larcx13 | 9,466 | 84/100 |
Rating metrics:
Outliers can be removed when calculating a mean average to dampen the effects of ratings outside the normal distribution. This figure is provided as the trimmed mean. A high standard deviation can be legitimate, but can sometimes indicate 'gaming' is occurring. Consider a simplified example* of an item receiving ratings of 100, 50, & 0. The mean average rating would be 50. However, ratings of 55, 50 & 45 could also result in the same average. The second average might be more trusted because there is more consensus around a particular rating (a lower deviation).
(*In practice, some tracks can have several thousand ratings)
This track has a Bayesian average rating of 76.3/100, a mean average of 76.4/100, and a trimmed mean (excluding outliers) of 76.4/100. The standard deviation for this track is 11.1.
Guess Who's Back comments
Be the first to add a comment for this track - add your comment!
Your feedback for Guess Who's Back
A lot of hard work happens in the background to keep BEA running, and it's especially difficult to do this when we can't pay our hosting fees :(
We work very hard to ensure our site is as fast (and FREE!) as possible, and we respect your privacy.
