Like full freedom will always be impossible because my freedoms may disrupt everyone elses freedoms. The only way to get the most freedom is to have the most money and forget the rules.
Basically it is all compromise otherwise the world falls apart. I mean someone could have the freedom to indulge in an addiction yet how can that be called true freedom? They are at the mercy of themselves.
Anyone want to add other ideas on freedom and how much we can have or should have?
I've always found this "full freedom" concept pretty twisted. It's like "full tolerance" where you have to be tolerant of my intolerance. Then intolerance takes over completely unless you have to be tolerant of my intolerance toward your intolerance. At that point the concept just falls apart.
So I guess that freedom and tolerance have to be collective agreements rather than simply your ability to do whatever you want. _________________
Like full freedom will always be impossible because my freedoms may disrupt everyone elses freedoms. The only way to get the most freedom is to have the most money and forget the rules.
Basically it is all compromise otherwise the world falls apart. I mean someone could have the freedom to indulge in an addiction yet how can that be called true freedom? They are at the mercy of themselves.
Anyone want to add other ideas on freedom and how much we can have or should have?
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
