View previous topic :: View next topic
|
|
Poll: Do you buy remastered versions of your favorite albums? |
|
Total Votes : 17 |
|
|
Author |
Message |
Jthomp81
Gender: Male
Age: 42
Location: Georgia
|
- #1
- Posted: 02/01/2013 15:00
- Post subject: Remastered albums
|
If you already own an album do you buy new remastered versions or seek out the best remaster? If so, what albums must you have the best version of?
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
davidhuret
Gender: Male
Location: Lille,France
|
- #2
- Posted: 02/01/2013 15:23
- Post subject:
|
If I think the album deserved to be remastered, yes.
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
Robert Anton Wilson
Epic Proghead
Gender: Male
Age: 56
Location: Inside
|
- #3
- Posted: 02/01/2013 15:50
- Post subject:
|
The old classic prog era albums remastered by Steven Wilson (King Crimson, Jethro Tull ... ) are highly worth it.
So far the one that impressed me the most is Lizard by King Crimson. Listening to the remastered CD really felt like listening to it for the first time again. I cannot wait to hear the remastered Lark's Tongues in Aspic. These are albums that were released in an age when audio technology wasn't yet able to properly render such music.
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
davidhuret
Gender: Male
Location: Lille,France
|
- #4
- Posted: 02/01/2013 15:59
- Post subject:
|
Sounds interesting. I may give them a go then.
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
RoundTheBend
I miss the comfort in being sad
Location: Ground Control
|
- #5
- Posted: 02/01/2013 17:34
- Post subject:
|
The only ones I have bought are the special releases of Boy, October, War, Under A Blood Red Sky, and The Joshua Tree.
I downloaded the Beatles remasters, and loved the remaster of those into stereo.
I also go Sgt. Peppers on vinyl, remastered...
Sometimes the remaster's ruin the work because they end up compressing it almost to the point of distortion, but if it is done right, it makes a sweet experience.
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
Mother Nature's Son
Gender: Male
Age: 31
|
- #6
- Posted: 02/01/2013 17:56
- Post subject:
|
sethmadsen wrote: | The only ones I have bought are the special releases of Boy, October, War, Under A Blood Red Sky, and The Joshua Tree. |
Oh, how is the remaster version of War? I own an older version of the CD and I've always thought that it sounds underproduced, is there any difference there? _________________ "The Beatles, the greatest band known to mankind." - Bismah Mughal
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
RFNAPLES
Level 8
Gender: Male
Age: 75
Location: Durham, NC, USA
|
|
Back to top
|
|
paladisiac
= music
Gender: Male
Location: Denver
|
|
Back to top
|
|
JMan
|
- #9
- Posted: 02/01/2013 23:17
- Post subject:
|
I just look for the remastered version instead of buying the original. Besides, I can still just go on YT. I don't see the point of starting a big collection unless you were to sell it one day with some classics on vinyl.
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
purple
|
- #10
- Posted: 02/01/2013 23:28
- Post subject:
|
I've only heard the original and remastered versions of two albums (to my knowledge): Stooges' Raw Power and Rolling Stones' Exile On Main Street. The versions of Raw Power (Iggy mix v. Bowie mix) were quite noticeably different; a lot of people prefer the Bowie mix but I grew up with the Iggy mix so I prefer that because it's what I'm used to I suppose. The Exile mixes were much less different, but still noticeably so; I don't really prefer one version to another.
However, when it comes to mixes of New Order singles, I almost always prefer the version that appears on Substance 1987. I can't even keep track of all the different mixes they have for their singles, and am pretty positive I haven't even heard every mix released, but I think the versions that appear on Substance are more refined. Especially tracks like Temptation and Bizarre Love Triangle.
Anyways, I think that generally mixing can improve or worsen the sound of a song or album drastically, but the effects of mixing are far outweighed by the content of the lyrics and musicianship.
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
|