historically acclaimed versus personally resonant

Goto page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7  Next
View previous topic :: View next topic

Poll: What's more important for an album when drawing up your overall BEA chart?
it is historically acclaimed:
4%
 4%  [3]
it is personally resonant:
95%
 95%  [65]
Total Votes : 68

  • Quote
Hi all,

This may have been asked before, but i'm asking it now. Which is more important to you in drawing up your "besteveralbums" chart -- that an album is historically and widely acclaimed or that it is personally significant or meaningful in your life?
_________________
fav artists NOW | ALL-TIME favs | i listen 2 more music than u so u don't have 2!
  • Quote
There's only going to ever be one correct answer here...

Unless you're Jman.
  • Quote
If an album is acclaimed and important but I personally don't like it too much, I always try to include it on my chart. Somehow.

There have been times I have really loved an album only to find out later it had no real importance or
Influence on music and wasn't generally recognized as great. Boy was a disappointed. What I would never do is include that album on my chart. Ever.
_________________
-Ryan

ONLY 4% of people can understand this chart! Come try!

My Fave Metal - you won't believe #5!!!
  • Quote
If I don't like an album, it won't be on my chart, regardless of the critical acclaim. The albums that mean the most to me, the ones that I love, those are the ones that go on my chart.

Now I will say that I can understand the importance of an album without actually liking the album as much. So if I'm making a chart of my 100 favorite albums, those will be the albums I like, but that could be different from a 100 most culturally important/significant albums chart.
_________________
Progressive Rock

Early Psychedelic Rock

Live Albums


Last edited by RockyRaccoon on 02/26/2014 19:58; edited 1 time in total
  • Quote
Mercury wrote:
If an album is acclaimed and important but I personally don't like it too much, I always try to include it on my chart. Somehow.

There have been times I have really loved an album only to find out later it had no real importance or
Influence on music and wasn't generally recognized as great. Boy was a disappointed. What I would never do is include that album on my chart. Ever.


Whenever I find an album I like that Rolling Stone hasn't included in their top 500 albums I immediately cast it aside, and never listen to it again.
  • Quote
eagerly awaiting the "historically acclaimed" option to hit 1
  • Quote
Wait, albums can have personal resonance?
  • Quote
Personal Resonance is much more important when making a personal "best ever albums" list.

It's a personal list!
  • Quote
That said, the more historically significant an album is, the more you're likely to like it, right? Or is it only true within certain groups of people with somewhat common tastes?
  • Quote
drakonium wrote:
That said, the more historically significant an album is, the more you're likely to like it, right?


I dont think ive found this to be true. My guess is that if I were to take a random album from, say RS500 and compare it to a random album from bandcamp, the chances of me liking one over the other would pretty much be equal.

...

Now that i say that tho im not too sure.. ๐Ÿค” I might have to test this out. This could be a very interesting experiment.

New topic  Closed
Topic Posters
All times are GMT>
Goto page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7  Next
Page 1 of 7


 

Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Similar Topics
Topic Author Forum
Your # 1 album on the overall chart h... NickVolos Music
Acclaimed Music Dored Suggestions
Most Acclaimed Albums - Alternative S... AfterHours Music Diaries
Can an album lose it's acclaimed status? newbands1 Music
What critically acclaimed album/s do ... Guest Music

 
Back to Top
Best Ever Albums
Install BEA for an app-like experience.