BEA's Rock and Roll Hall of Fame

Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8  Next
View previous topic :: View next topic

Poll: Would you participate?
Yes! Let's do twice a year!
52%
 52%  [21]
Just once a year, please.
32%
 32%  [13]
Nah, this is lame.
15%
 15%  [6]
Total Votes : 40

Author Message
Mies
  • #21
  • Posted: 12/18/2014 11:55
  • Post subject:
  • Reply with quote
I'm with you, I like the idea! Very Happy
I think it'd be better to do once a year, but anyway, let's see..
Oh and thanks for considering me as an "essential" user.. wow! Razz
Listmeister
Gender: Male

Location: Ohio
United States
  • #22
  • Posted: 12/18/2014 15:54
  • Post subject:
  • Reply with quote
SuedeSwede wrote:
Either way, this is a really great idea, and I'd prefer it to be a separate entity to the BEAMAs. My opinion is keep the 5 artists / 1 non-musician / 4 albums ballot form, that's great, and make it twice a year.


Just wondering, why do we want to induct more artists than albums? This site is about the albums, not the artists.

Here's a plan. Four albums, 2x per year, five artists (plus one) 1x per year. An artist can only have one album inducted per year (otherwise we'd have three Radiohead, three Beatles, and two Dylan albums the first year).
  • Visit poster's website
  • View user's profile
  • Send private message
  • Visit poster's website
benpaco
Who's gonna watch you die?

Age: 27

Location: California
United States
  • #23
  • Posted: 12/19/2014 01:29
  • Post subject:
  • Reply with quote
Jhereko wrote:
Ben: Would you want to count the 2 prior inductees or just start over? Also from my point of view if you were going to do it twice a year 5 inductees seems like a lot, but it's up to you.


I wouldn't want to throw those results out and would have them in their respective years, asterisks next to them for "pre-Hall AMA days".

Also I agree with you there, having looked at what that would entail based on the "future rock hall" website. My leaning at this point, if twice a year, would be to have 3 artists, 2 albums inducted each ballot, with the additional "non-performer" category either in with AMAs or in the separate election. Thoughts?
_________________


. . . 2016 . . . 2015 . . .

Things I Make
  • Visit poster's website
  • View user's profile
  • Send private message
Goodsir
  • #24
  • Posted: 12/19/2014 01:53
  • Post subject:
  • Reply with quote
I for one am in full support of this idea. It'll be nice to see BEA's take on something that is just a total disaster at this point in the real world.
benpaco
Who's gonna watch you die?

Age: 27

Location: California
United States
  • #25
  • Posted: 12/19/2014 02:06
  • Post subject:
  • Reply with quote
Goodsir wrote:
I for one am in full support of this idea. It'll be nice to see BEA's take on something that is just a total disaster at this point in the real world.


Maybe the next BEAM should be a U2 album, then, amirite?

*crickets*
_________________


. . . 2016 . . . 2015 . . .

Things I Make
  • Visit poster's website
  • View user's profile
  • Send private message
junodog4
Future Grumpy Old Man
Gender: Male

Location: Calgary
Canada
  • #26
  • Posted: 12/19/2014 05:16
  • Post subject:
  • Reply with quote
Goodsir wrote:
I for one am in full support of this idea. It'll be nice to see BEA's take on something that is just a total disaster at this point in the real world.


Shall we take over Rolling Stone, then?

I am all in for the idea.
_________________
Finnegan was super bad-ass.
  • Visit poster's website
  • View user's profile
  • Send private message
Goodsir
  • #27
  • Posted: 12/19/2014 21:10
  • Post subject:
  • Reply with quote
junodog4 wrote:
Shall we take over Rolling Stone, then?

No, haha. Gonna need some help, this isn't a one man job
Precedent
  • #28
  • Posted: 12/20/2014 00:46
  • Post subject:
  • Reply with quote
I don't think that I like this much, something feels like we'll just see the same ol' artists getting picked
RepoMan
  • #29
  • Posted: 12/20/2014 01:26
  • Post subject:
  • Reply with quote
Precedent wrote:
I don't think that I like this much, something feels like we'll just see the same ol' artists getting picked


I think it's the debates that could b raised over precedence that might make it interesting & worthwhile. Who deserves to go in first & why sort of thing. (e.g. Chuck Berry vs. Elvis. Who's the real king of rock n' roll? )
sp4cetiger
  • #30
  • Posted: 12/20/2014 01:44
  • Post subject:
  • Reply with quote
RepoMan wrote:
I think it's the debates that could b raised over precedence that might make it interesting & worthwhile. Who deserves to go in first & why sort of thing. (e.g. Chuck Berry vs. Elvis. Who's the real king of rock n' roll? )


I think he's saying that these we'd only be seeing artists like the Beach Boys, Nick Drake, the Smiths, and other generic forum favorites.

It might lead to more interesting conversations if there were guidelines of some sort (like by decade, genre, etc.), rather than just voting on who's the overall "best". I'm not sure the best way to go about that, though, and it may make things too complicated.
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   This topic is locked: you cannot edit posts or make replies.
All times are GMT
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8  Next
Page 3 of 8


 

Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Similar Topics
Topic Author Forum
Rap in the Rock N Roll Hall of Fame michael44bishop Music
Rock and Roll Hall of Fame Mdemauri Music
Opinions of Rock and Roll Hall of Fame pearljammer13 Music
2016 Rock N Roll Hall of Fame. Does i... AAL2014 Music
2021 Rock & Roll Hall of Fame Nom... baystateoftheart Music

 
Back to Top