View previous topic :: View next topic
|
|
Author |
Message |
AfterHours
Gender: Male
Location: originally from scaruffi.com ;-)
|
- #21
- Posted: 12/05/2022 05:47
- Post subject:
|
Hayden wrote: | I'd go on a limb and say Black Girl is where African cinema started. Staplepiece. It's a slow burn, and definitely not everyone's pace, but it has this very raw kick within the silences. Cinematography's also like nothing before it.
Sembène's filmography should be on everyone's radar— Camp de Thiaroye is particularly underrated (probably his best), but Mandabi and Moolaadé are also very good works. Not quite sure why Xala is his most popular... I think it's his weakest effort by a lot.
And yeah, I should be able to figure out a time when the 70s poll works. In the meantime, never hurts to get a head start on some watches/rewatches. |
Thanks Hayden, I liked it a lot and would give it around a 7/10 on my scale. It's a very humble, sincere film, moves a little bit like Bresson (in terms of its rhythm, editing). Probably owes something to Cassavetes, Godard, Bresson, but overall a rather unique, small, very independent film that effectively conveys the protagonist's point of view without over-emphasizing it. As you said: the raw kick within the silences. The quiet tension just below the surface. Perhaps her decision to carry out the act that she did in the very end was a bit rushed (cinematically) and was a bit hard to fathom in how it was developed (perhaps could've used some additional development of conflict and emotional breaking point beyond what had already been established), but it still worked well and the suddenness adds a certain shock and emptiness to it that fits the tones of the film, the lack of empathy of the couple, the inhumane way she is seen. The end when he returns to Africa is exceptional in how it plays out and in the symbolism of how he gets treated and with the kid chasing him. (Note: I intentionally wrote about this in very generic, mostly non-descript ways so as not to give away spoilers) _________________ Best Classical
Best Films
Best Paintings
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
AfterHours
Gender: Male
Location: originally from scaruffi.com ;-)
|
- #22
- Posted: 12/05/2022 05:51
- Post subject:
|
Apparently, S & S is about a month away from revealing all the individual lists of the critics and directors that voted.
Fortunately, some have been shared on twitter and elsewhere by some of the voters wanting to reveal for themselves which films they voted for. And someone with a lot of time on their hands tracked a bunch of those down and posted them in one place here:
https://www.worldofreel.com/blog/2022/1...jfs5r7oihc _________________ Best Classical
Best Films
Best Paintings
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
CA Dreamin
Gender: Male
Location: LA
|
- #23
- Posted: 12/05/2022 18:43
- Post subject:
|
I'm afraid I can only half-echo the sentiment for Black Girl. Agreed it's humble and sincere, and conveys a strong narrative. But it's channeled in such a blunt, melodramatic fashion that I didn't find very interesting to watch. It also didn't help how amateur it looked, and the overuse of the mask as colonial symbolism. Watching Black Girl felt more like a homework assignment, an intro to African cinema. Which is indeed important, for Black Girl is [from my research] the first major film from Africa. But importance doesn't equal greatness. I'd much rather re-watch Atlantics.
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
MadhattanJack
I mean, metal is okay, but...
Gender: Male
|
- #24
- Posted: 12/07/2022 05:28
- Post subject:
|
This story has now made the New York Times, and well, just about every other major daily and news site, really.
I swear on a stack of Go 2's that this comment did not come from me, though it's pretty much exactly what I would have written if I were a New York Times subscriber with a few minutes to spare.
Anyway, I guess I've made my peace with it at this point — I even bought some Brussels sprouts at the grocery store today, just so they can sit in the fridge for a few weeks before I realize I'm never going to eat them and finally throw them away.
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
Applerill
Autistic Princess <3
Gender: Female
Age: 30
Location: Chicago
|
- #25
- Posted: 12/07/2022 05:40
- Post subject:
|
Darn, y'all have clearly never hung around a queer arts space, because Jeanne Dielman is universally beloved as you can get (with News From Home not far behind).
I do have to say, though, that this phenomenon DOES show a certain kind of hypocrisy for how conservatives look at art. Because on one hand, they'll claim that this happened because too many people were invited, "diluting" the contributions of hardcore cinephiles. In the same breath, though, they'll claim that the problem with Jeanne Dielman taking the top spot is one of accessibility, since such a difficult film shouldn't be so assumed to be seen by everyone.
Now, Jeanne Dielman is not an absolute favorite of mine (though I still love it, there are at least a half-dozen other Akerman films I far prefer, including her debut feature Je Tu Il Elle, which was a huge influence on We're All Going to the World's Fair); but the arguments against it feel so much like those from Objectivists who hated the way critics voted for Ulysses as the greatest novel of the 20th century.
Anyway, here is the ballot I composed for it this past summer. It's not particularly diverse, but I think it pretty well captures most of the biggest influences on my own filmmaking (there's no Akerman, but no Godard or Lynch or Von Trier either), and I can't imagine taking any of these out.
https://twitter.com/cookierill/status/1...6912806912
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
MadhattanJack
I mean, metal is okay, but...
Gender: Male
|
- #26
- Posted: 12/07/2022 09:05
- Post subject:
|
Applerill wrote: | Darn, y'all have clearly never hung around a queer arts space, because Jeanne Dielman is universally beloved as you can get (with News From Home not far behind). |
Well... I saw it on TCM a few years back, for what that's worth. It was on a couple of months ago too, and I watched it for a few minutes just to remind myself, but let's be honest, it's not a movie you really need to see twice to figure out what's going on.
Quote: | I do have to say, though, that this phenomenon DOES show a certain kind of hypocrisy for how conservatives look at art. Because on one hand, they'll claim that this happened because too many people were invited, "diluting" the contributions of hardcore cinephiles. In the same breath, though, they'll claim that the problem with Jeanne Dielman taking the top spot is one of accessibility, since such a difficult film shouldn't be so assumed to be seen by everyone. |
Ehh, I think you're being too kind. Conservatives, at least political ones in the USA and most of Europe, are basically going to say it was picked because it's a movie "about" a woman, made by women (the entire crew were women, not just the director), and the people involved in selecting it are just pandering to the "woke mob." And maybe they are, to some extent, but in any case... conservatives these days (if they can even be called that) aren't going to care about the actual selection process or whether or not most people will (or can) ever get to see it, they'll just assume the whole business is "rigged" to make them all feel bad and reject it purely on that basis.
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
EyeKanFly
Head Bear Master/Galactic Emperor
Age: 33
Location: Gotham
|
- #27
- Posted: 12/07/2022 15:02
- Post subject:
|
As someone who had never heard of Jeanne Dielman before this poll... 1) I'm a tad embarrassed because I do have family members who are huge film buffs and involved in film and I tend to get recommendations from them. 2) I'm super intrigued to watch it now. I suppose that might be like a music novice saying they've never heard of Marvin Gaye and were compelled to listen after the new Rolling Stone 500 dropped in 2020. But I'm glad that my horizons are being broadened by this type of thing. Even when I should be broadening on my own and broadening even more than this poll has done for me.
Applerill wrote: | Now, Jeanne Dielman is not an absolute favorite of mine (though I still love it, there are at least a half-dozen other Akerman films I far prefer, including her debut feature Je Tu Il Elle, which was a huge influence on We're All Going to the World's Fair); but the arguments against it feel so much like those from Objectivists who hated the way critics voted for Ulysses as the greatest novel of the 20th century. |
I'm super intrigued by this analogy. Ulysses became one of my favorite books and I was NOT expecting that when I began reading it. I'll report back on how I feel about that analogy after I've watched Jeanne Dielman, but this is a really interesting point.
On a separate film note... I'm also super intrigued by Sátántangó but I'm daunted by the 7+ hour run time. For those who have seen it, can anyone recommend how to partition it? I've read that it's essentially in 12 "installments" but I don't know if it's appropriate to watch it in ~30 minute chunks. Does three 2.5 hr "installments" make more sense? Or should it really be seen in one sitting? _________________ 51 Washington, D.C. albums!
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
cestuneblague
Edgy to the Choir
Location: MA/FL
|
- #28
- Posted: 12/07/2022 17:06
- Post subject:
|
Yeah I'm never quite sold on how these all come together, but it seems like there was definitely a different vibe around this one- which perhaps make sense in context. I donno if Jeanne Dielmann was definitively a "Make a Statement"-type of number one choice, though in general it fits with the Critics who often look more towards overall cultural impact while directors are often much more focused intently on the language of film (though not that the latter is absent completely). Beyond just the influence of it's screenplay and all-women behind-the-camera team and how important it was to a lot more often-underrepresented-at-the-time film fans, it did really kind of streamline and perfect the fluid, faux real-time structure that became much more common in the 90s and onwards, so again it does have a lot of impact on the filmmaking process and future ideas to go along with it's outside cultural impact. But did it really want to be #1? Not only how much that got "Citizen Kane" backlash for a long time but also Tokyo Story (which was #1 on one of the polls recently, am I wrong?), again I agree now it's going to be picked apart and, like those films, viewed often beyond just what it initially planned to do as a film by itself. And again Im sure there are going to be loads of fun conversations revolving around if you disagree with this at #1 you're some sort of bigot or putting it this at #1 is just tokenism and trying to appeal to modern "wokeness" (whatever the fuck that means anymore). Again is any major film viewed beyond that argument these days? Though again you can't really say this film or women-directed movies in general are ignored in mainstream critics circles anymore either. Still some lost gems underrepresented, maybe, but not all ignored.
One interesting question I do have is the inclusion of films that have are quite recent, which do feel more blatant as trying to hit on the modern zeitgeist. However, it really does seem like movies really need to weather the change of time to cement themselves as classics, as I can already remember a bunch of late 90s and 2000s-era films that were viewed as groundbreaking and instant classics that have been completely forgotten (or even last decade, I mean do we need to go over the hype for "Boyhood"? Did that make the list here?), so I feel like inclusions of films like Get Out and Parasite to be a bit pre-mature, though they could very well hold up a decade down the line. However I'm fine with the usual kind of waiting on the films that were released between the last poll and this one.
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
AfterHours
Gender: Male
Location: originally from scaruffi.com ;-)
|
- #29
- Posted: 12/07/2022 21:36
- Post subject:
|
AfterHours wrote: | Apparently, S & S is about a month away from revealing all the individual lists of the critics and directors that voted.
Fortunately, some have been shared on twitter and elsewhere by some of the voters wanting to reveal for themselves which films they voted for. And someone with a lot of time on their hands tracked a bunch of those down and posted them in one place here:
https://www.worldofreel.com/blog/2022/1...jfs5r7oihc |
Btw, I just realized that this is also consistently being updated into the present. There are a number of new additions since I last commented just a few posts above... so is a very good source, all in one place, of most/all revealed voter's lists so far, until S & S unveils the lot of 'em (around early Jan 2023). _________________ Best Classical
Best Films
Best Paintings
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
Applerill
Autistic Princess <3
Gender: Female
Age: 30
Location: Chicago
|
- #30
- Posted: 12/07/2022 22:57
- Post subject:
|
Let me try to make the most utilitarian case for Jeanne Dielman I can: It takes a lot of the structuralism of Michael Snow and puts it in the frame of a chamber drama. A lot of people find that combination extremely engaging. On the Criterion Channel, for instance, you can find clips featuring artists ranging from Sofia Coppola to Karyn Kusama to Jhumpa Lahiri discussing how amazing VISCERAL it is. But I think that it's harder to understand that if you frame it JUST in terms of contemporary slow cinema and ignore how it was so influenced by the New American Cinema and other 60s experimental film artists.
ANYWAY, RE: Satantango, I think Tarr is actually trying to do something very different than Akerman. I know this sounds like a shitpost, but I genuinely think that, of all the major "slow cinema" auteurs, Tarr is the closest thing to Spielberg (though Angelopoulos might be a close second). Someone very close to me IRL once panned Satantango by saying it's "a bunch of guys trying to remake Tarkovsky Be Kind Rewind style", but I think that's missing the point. Tarr wants to bring out almost a sentimentality of cynicism towards you, and uses basically and extended version of the "Spielberg oner" to bring that upon you. As Rosenbaum put it, he and Kiarostami "use the tools of Hollywood to beat them at their own game".
(Also, Satantango has 12 chapter markers, and I think going through 2 a night is pretty manageable. I also recommend having a "Satantango party" where you invite friends over)
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
|
|
All times are GMT
|
Page 3 of 5 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|
|