Lotus Light (track)
by Tim Hecker
Lotus Light appears on the following album(s) by Tim Hecker:
- No Highs (track #4) (this album) (2023)
Listen to Lotus Light on YouTube
Lotus Light ratings
Average Rating = (n ÷ (n + m)) × av + (m ÷ (n + m)) × AVwhere:
av = trimmed mean average rating an item has currently received.
n = number of ratings an item has currently received.
m = minimum number of ratings required for an item to appear in a 'top-rated' chart (currently 10).
AV = the site mean average rating.
Showing latest 5 ratings for this track. | Show all 11 ratings for this track.
| Rating | Date updated | Member | Track ratings | Avg. track rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 03/30/2026 07:36 | Exist-en-ciel | 100,917 | 71/100 | |
| 06/12/2023 10:25 |  ssteve | 25,367 | 78/100 | |
| 05/04/2023 05:27 | juanr1096 | 71,455 | 79/100 | |
| 04/22/2023 08:09 | LosWochos | 311,421 | 80/100 | |
| 04/19/2023 16:21 | DoubleZ | 1,141 | 81/100 |
Rating metrics:
Outliers can be removed when calculating a mean average to dampen the effects of ratings outside the normal distribution. This figure is provided as the trimmed mean. A high standard deviation can be legitimate, but can sometimes indicate 'gaming' is occurring. Consider a simplified example* of an item receiving ratings of 100, 50, & 0. The mean average rating would be 50. However, ratings of 55, 50 & 45 could also result in the same average. The second average might be more trusted because there is more consensus around a particular rating (a lower deviation).
(*In practice, some tracks can have several thousand ratings)
This track is rated in the top 12% of all tracks on BestEverAlbums.com. This track has a Bayesian average rating of 78.4/100, a mean average of 80.5/100, and a trimmed mean (excluding outliers) of 80.5/100. The standard deviation for this track is 8.6.
Lotus Light comments
Be the first to add a comment for this track - add your comment!
Your feedback for Lotus Light
A lot of hard work happens in the background to keep BEA running, and it's especially difficult to do this when we can't pay our hosting fees :(
We work very hard to ensure our site is as fast (and FREE!) as possible, and we respect your privacy.
