Love. Angel. Music. Baby. (studio album) by Gwen Stefani
Condition: New
Gwen Stefani bestography
Love. Angel. Music. Baby. is ranked as the best album by Gwen Stefani.
Upcoming concerts
Listen to Love. Angel. Music. Baby. on YouTube
Love. Angel. Music. Baby. track list
The tracks on this album have an average rating of 72 out of 100 (all tracks have been rated).
Love. Angel. Music. Baby. rankings
Latest 20 charts that this album appears in:
You can include this album in your own chart from the My Charts page!
Love. Angel. Music. Baby. collection
Showing latest 20 members who have this album in their collection | Show all 56 members
Love. Angel. Music. Baby. ratings
where:
av = trimmed mean average rating an item has currently received.
n = number of ratings an item has currently received.
m = minimum number of ratings required for an item to appear in a 'top-rated' chart (currently 10).
AV = the site mean average rating.
Showing latest 5 ratings for this album. | Show all 124 ratings for this album.
Rating | Date updated | Member | Album ratings | Avg. album rating |
---|---|---|---|---|
03/19/2024 23:56 | jack1992 | 317 | 50/100 | |
01/09/2024 14:43 | Squonk007 | 586 | 23/100 | |
12/08/2023 13:25 | fabm0 | 5,977 | 59/100 | |
12/02/2023 11:30 | rafaelcalazans | 2,026 | 53/100 | |
08/25/2023 11:19 | DommeDamian | 6,267 | 49/100 |
Rating metrics:
Outliers can be removed when calculating a mean average to dampen the effects of ratings outside the normal distribution. This figure is provided as the trimmed mean. A high standard deviation can be legitimate, but can sometimes indicate 'gaming' is occurring. Consider a simplified example* of an item receiving ratings of 100, 50, & 0. The mean average rating would be 50. However, ratings of 55, 50 & 45 could also result in the same average. The second average might be more trusted because there is more consensus around a particular rating (a lower deviation).
(*In practice, some albums can have several thousand ratings)
This album has a Bayesian average rating of 63.7/100, a mean average of 62.9/100, and a trimmed mean (excluding outliers) of 62.9/100. The standard deviation for this album is 22.0.
Please log in or register if you want to be able to leave a rating
Love. Angel. Music. Baby. favourites
Showing all 14 members who have added this album as a favourite
Love. Angel. Music. Baby. comments
Showing all 9 comments |
Most Helpful First | Newest First | Maximum Rated First |
Longest Comments First
(Only showing comments with -2 votes or higher. You can alter this threshold from your profile page. Manage Profile)
It was kinda ok back then, but it has aged rather disappointingly.
Ressurge no pop de forma fantástica.
To me this is one of the worst albums ever recorded. headache inducing garbage imho. As bad as any work of art from any genre. Pure trash.
a pop masterpiece. i found it really hard to listen to it beyond Hollaback Girl because the first three songs are total killers and the other can sound like filler. But not at all. My favourites is Luxurious and the first three. Special mention to A Long Way To Go, i found it really interesting.
Very good electropop/dance-rock/new wave/R&B/hip hop/soul/disco album. Best 10 songs average is 88,8/100 and the album can get very good 90/100. Best songs are "What you waiting for?" and "Cool" both 95/100, closely followed by "Rich girl" and "Hollaback girl" both 90/100 and next "Bubble pop electric" and "Danger zone" both 85/100. Favourite!
Don't know why I have enjoyed this album. It's totally hollywoodesque... I guess it includes very well produced hits.
I'm not a big Gwen Stefani fan , but this is a nice album with some really good tracks
I'm long since tired of this and all the copycats it created, but you've got to give Gwen credit - she was a new type of pop diva, and was different from the princesses of the day.
For fans of No Doubt.
Please log in or register if you want to be able to add a comment
Your feedback for Love. Angel. Music. Baby.
A lot of hard work happens in the background to keep BEA running, and it's especially difficult to do this when we can't pay our hosting fees :(
We work very hard to ensure our site is as fast (and FREE!) as possible, and we respect your privacy.