Revolution 9 (track) by The Beatles
Revolution 9 appears on the following album(s) by The Beatles:
- The Beatles (The White Album) (track #29) (this album) (1968)
- The Beatles Box Set (track #159) (compilation) (1988)
- The Beatles In Mono (track #150) (compilation) (2009)
- Mono Collection (track #150) (compilation) (1982)
Upcoming concerts
Listen to Revolution 9 on YouTube
Revolution 9 ratings
where:
av = trimmed mean average rating an item has currently received.
n = number of ratings an item has currently received.
m = minimum number of ratings required for an item to appear in a 'top-rated' chart (currently 10).
AV = the site mean average rating.
Rating | Date updated | Member | Track ratings | Avg. track rating |
---|---|---|---|---|
3 days ago | Exist-en-ciel | 12,666 | 76/100 | |
5 days ago | bryatk | 2,938 | 72/100 | |
12/05/2024 18:42 | CokeBabies | 1,637 | 84/100 | |
12/02/2024 04:00 | II | 1,868 | 62/100 | |
11/30/2024 02:20 | LukasAntoine00s | 3,353 | 82/100 |
Rating metrics:
Outliers can be removed when calculating a mean average to dampen the effects of ratings outside the normal distribution. This figure is provided as the trimmed mean. A high standard deviation can be legitimate, but can sometimes indicate 'gaming' is occurring. Consider a simplified example* of an item receiving ratings of 100, 50, & 0. The mean average rating would be 50. However, ratings of 55, 50 & 45 could also result in the same average. The second average might be more trusted because there is more consensus around a particular rating (a lower deviation).
(*In practice, some tracks can have several thousand ratings)
This track has a Bayesian average rating of 63.3/100, a mean average of 63.1/100, and a trimmed mean (excluding outliers) of 63.1/100. The standard deviation for this track is 26.1.
Please log in or register if you want to be able to leave a rating
Revolution 9 favourites
Showing all 18 members who have added this track as a favourite
Revolution 9 comments
Showing latest 10 comments | Show all 41 comments |
Most Helpful First | Newest First | Maximum Rated First |
Longest Comments First
(Only showing comments with -2 votes or higher. You can alter this threshold from your profile page. Manage Profile)
I’m a fan of weird, I think that Scott walker is an absolute genius so I like stuff that goes out there but this is Self indulgent twaddle of the worst kind.
Say what you want about this song, but it's one of the most important pieces of music in the last century.
A bit unnecessary but it shows The Beatles' eclectic range of composing music. I meant John, did the Jackson Pollock moment, but it ended up being a "pretentious" piece of collage shit. It places quite well in the album and it gives quite an attention to me.
This comment is beneath your viewing threshold.
As a song by itself is just clearly bad, but i can't help it but to love the transition to Good Night.
I have never understood this song. I hesitate to hate it, because they are the Beatles. Maybe one day, I will get it.
You either hate it or just don't like it. A sound collage attributed to John, but with contributions by Yoko Ono and George, spending over a good eight minutes, it starts out rather cool, with a voice speaking out the words "Number 9" repeatedly. After that, it breaks down into a cacophony of sounds, which aren't connected at all. The musical equivalent of a bad LSD trip.
I love how this track has created so many comments. It is there to shock. Of course, it is chaotic and difficult to listen and but it is obvious for me that it was put there to make us feel uncomfortable.
It’s a great track. I think the reason it doesn’t quite click for people is that the white album is quite random as a whole and it’s hard to feel good about something this out there in an album that gives no notion as to being this weird.
This comment is beneath your viewing threshold.
Please log in or register if you want to be able to add a comment
Your feedback for Revolution 9
A lot of hard work happens in the background to keep BEA running, and it's especially difficult to do this when we can't pay our hosting fees :(
We work very hard to ensure our site is as fast (and FREE!) as possible, and we respect your privacy.